View Poll Results: If there is untagged images or graphics…

Voters
17. You may not vote on this poll
  • In CreativeSuite I use Adobe RGB as document RGB

    3 17.65%
  • In CreativeSuite I use sRGB as documentRGB

    12 70.59%
  • I turn off colour Management (InDesign 2.0)

    0 0%
  • In the RIP i use AdobeRGB

    2 11.76%
  • In the RIP i use sRGB

    5 29.41%
  • simple RGB or other option than above (please comment)

    1 5.88%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15
  1. #1
    Lukas Engqvist's Avatar
    Lukas Engqvist is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    1,595

    Default What profile is Untagged RGB

    Just need to check what you are using. I'd also love to hear the arguments you have. I am hoping all agree, but please be honest.

  2. #2
    TerryWyse's Avatar
    TerryWyse is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    252

    Default

    The "correct" answer is to leave no image untagged but assign/embed something so downstream color management is going to be predictable rather than at the mercy of what person or system gets the file next.

    Having said that, encountering an untagged RGB image at least says *something* about the color IQ of the person who gave it to you...that usually means the safest bet is to assume/assign/embed sRGB.

    In a perfect world (and how I train folks to approach an untagged RGB image) is to start by assigning sRGB, AdobeRGB, ColorMatchRGB and ProPhotoRGB, roughly in that order, and see which is the most likely candidate (as seen on your proplerly calibrated and profiled display of course!).



    Terry
    Terence Wyse, WyseConsul
    Color Management Consulting, G7 Certified Expert

  3. #3
    Lukas Engqvist's Avatar
    Lukas Engqvist is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    1,595

    Default

    Since there are formats that don't support tags, and other programs that don't honour tags, there must be a procedure for "incorrect" files... or are we saying .gif, and .png are incorrect under all circumstances?

  4. #4
    DCurry is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    254

    Default

    I use sRGB as my default for untagged images. The reason is that we get a lot of non-professional digital photos from consumer-grade point-and-shoot cameras, and even if they are not technically shooting in sRGB it is pretty darned close. If I default to AdobeRGB, untagged photos tend to look too red.
    Dan Curry
    Looking for prepress work in the Baltimore area. FusionPro, Apogee, & Prinergy.

  5. #5
    Stephen Marsh is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    578

    Default

    In a world where one size fits all, where one is after repeatable results if there is no profile tagged to the image (rather than pleasing or "correct" results)? = sRGB

    One could pick sRGB for consumer/office customers, Adobe RGB for graphic designers and Pro Photo RGB for photographers...if you knew who was who...and some photographers use Adobe RGB - so it is really hard to make blind assumptions. Not to mention that in Europe ECI RGB may be more common than Adobe RGB etc.

    In a world where you have the luxury to second guess the folk supplying you files? = I use the Photoshop action attached to pick the "most pleasing" result, hand in hand with the info palette set to L*a*b* and or other values (in addition to a profiled monitor preview).


    Regards,

    Stephen Marsh
    Attached Files Attached Files

  6. #6
    Lukas Engqvist's Avatar
    Lukas Engqvist is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    1,595

    Default

    @Steophen oops I didn't put colormatch RGB as an option :S the "newsprint" RGB, there was a period we that was what was in circulation... 15 -12 years ago before the www was stable mind you.

  7. #7
    Stephen Marsh is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    578

    Default

    I don't think it is that big an issue Lukas, Apple RGB and ColorMatch RGB seem to have had their day (as has Bruce RGB, Don RGB etc). sRGB would appear to be the low end standard. Sure one can include these two similar 1.8 gamma profiles, however times have changed and I would presume that most OS X users have a monitor more similar to 2.2 gamma than 1.8 (and yes, I know - sRGB is not exactly 2.2 gamma).

    Reading over my post, it would appear that I need to update my action to include ECI RGB!

    Stephen Marsh

  8. #8
    rich apollo's Avatar
    rich apollo is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    The Great State of Tulsa!
    Posts
    940

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lukas Engqvist View Post
    Since there are formats that don't support tags, and other programs that don't honour tags, there must be a procedure for "incorrect" files... or are we saying .gif, and .png are incorrect under all circumstances?
    GIF will be in the colorspace of your monitor, by default, won't it? It is incapable of carrying an ICC profile, and so is simply RGB values being sent to your monitor.

    PNG, can carry a profile, as Leonard told us on your other thread, but that depends somewhat on the software writing the file. There is a "chunk", as the spec calls it, that is dedicated to ICC profiles, but it may not get written. Without a profiile, PNG is assumed to be sRGB, unless it's grayscale.

    GIF and PNG would be "incorrect" for print purposes, in my opinion. The output channels that they would be appropriate for, epub or web, don't support ICC profiles well, if at all, do they?

  9. #9
    Lukas Engqvist's Avatar
    Lukas Engqvist is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    1,595

    Default

    GIF and PNG are quite common in technical manuals, especially if they are manuals that explain how to use a screen interface. So I would say they may not be "design" files it does not disqualify them as appropriate for certain kinds of print. In reports, courseware, books that accompany a seminar etc they are normal, and printable, if handled correctly.

  10. #10
    buckeye's Avatar
    buckeye is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Akron, Ohio
    Posts
    177

    Default

    You guys make my head spin.
    OS X 10.5.8 • Rampage 11.3 • Javelin 8300 • Epson 9900


Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Sponsors

Esko Sponsored Content