Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 14 of 14
  1. #11
    Stephen Marsh is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    929

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by meddington View Post
    SWOP, Gracol and Fogra should all be using ISO2846 compliant inksets, but perhaps with different acheivable solid CIELab values due to differences in substrate. Gracol and Fogra 39 are actually based off of the same characterization data, with tweaks to gracol for tonality and grey balance.

    Thanks for the clarification, perhaps the media and solid ink density is what accounts for the differences in the L*a*b* values.


    Stephen Marsh

  2. #12
    rich apollo's Avatar
    rich apollo is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    The Great State of Tulsa!
    Posts
    1,051

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stephen Marsh View Post
    Lukas, if it helps to think in Euro terms, one could say that SWOP is "similar" to F28 and GRACoL is "similar" to F39 (however SWOP is targeting a different inkset, so there is more of a discrepency than with the Fogra spaces which are more similar to each other).
    Stephen,
    Why do you say "…SWOP is targeting a different inkset…"?

  3. #13
    Stephen Marsh is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    929

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rich apollo View Post
    Stephen,
    Why do you say "…SWOP is targeting a different inkset…"?
    When I have compared the solid L*a*b* values of the three most common SWOP profiles to each other, GRACoL and Fogra spaces - the differences made me think that the issue was inksets rather than web vs. flatsheet and stock and solid ink density.

    Stephen Marsh

  4. #14
    danremaley is offline Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    51

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by David Milisock View Post
    >since most peoples working space is SWOP.

    How can what you said be true if most of his client files are SWOP? He's just introduced an unnecessary conversion and you can't get more color than they send you. I mewan the man said most people are using SWOP as is the Adobe default.
    For more than 50 years color seps. were made to SWOP standards, (litho had no standards) so the publication industry attempted to get the web printers to proof and print to a standard. Photoshop's default is at, or near, this same 20% midtone gain. In my opinion the best numbers to print to are (DRY) 1.00Y 1.30C 1.40M 1.70 K. With midtone gains of 18%Y 20%M 20%C 22%K. Gracol calls for higher densities but that will cause a Mag. cast at these gain numbers. I teach the pressroom to print the Mag/cyan gains the same and Yelo 2% less - makes perfect gray balance. Lighter or darker depending on the numbers, but most important gray, with ISO inks.
    Dan Remaley
    Last edited by prwhite; 10-18-2012 at 08:27 AM. Reason: Spamming - Using PrintPlanet to advertise your company.


Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Sponsors