Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14
  1. #1
    nshadab is offline Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    44

    Default Hozz this machine from KODAK?

    Hello Friends,

    Would you plz offer your expert comment for

    KODAK Trendsetter 400 (830 nm Thermal Imaging, Semi Automatic, EXTERNAL DRUM)
    WITH
    GECKO 85T Processor

    Or should i opt for KODAK T860 / T1250 Plate Processors?

    waiting for your expert comments.....

    Thanks in advance.

  2. #2
    nshadab is offline Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    44

    Default

    This is to add, we are going to start a production house....
    So most of the our customers would be presses. and quality is not their first priority.

  3. #3
    Kevin@Kodak's Avatar
    Kevin@Kodak is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Rochester, NY, USA
    Posts
    240

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nshadab View Post
    This is to add, we are going to start a production house....
    So most of the our customers would be presses. and quality is not their first priority.
    Obviously I'm biased, but I'm sure you'll find the reputation of the Trendsetter to be excellent. It's a solid work-horse that will last for many years, with outstanding quality.

    As for the processor - choose the plate type you are going to use first. That's a MUCH more important decision. From there, choose the processor that works best with THAT plate. (most plates can work in multiple processor types these days, but often they'll work best in a certain type)

    Kevin.
    Kevin Cazabon / kevin.cazabon@kodak.com
    Link on Facebook, Plaxo and LinkedIn. Twitter: PlatesAreUs

  4. #4
    nshadab is offline Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    44

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kevin@Kodak View Post
    Obviously I'm biased, but I'm sure you'll find the reputation of the Trendsetter to be excellent. It's a solid work-horse that will last for many years, with outstanding quality.

    As for the processor - choose the plate type you are going to use first. That's a MUCH more important decision. From there, choose the processor that works best with THAT plate. (most plates can work in multiple processor types these days, but often they'll work best in a certain type)

    Kevin.
    Hi Kevin,

    thanks for your suggestions, i must expects that when i saw @KODAK with your name.. just kiddin...

    Actually my vendor suggested me to use KODAK PLATES. So would you mind commenting on that portion as well....

    Gecko 85T with Kodak Thermal Plates...

  5. #5
    Kevin@Kodak's Avatar
    Kevin@Kodak is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Rochester, NY, USA
    Posts
    240

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nshadab View Post
    Hi Kevin,

    thanks for your suggestions, i must expects that when i saw @KODAK with your name.. just kiddin...

    Actually my vendor suggested me to use KODAK PLATES. So would you mind commenting on that portion as well....

    Gecko 85T with Kodak Thermal Plates...
    I understand - I would never have said they're bad of course... but if I thought that, I simply wouldn't have commented in the first place.

    Do you know which plate type they're recommending? To answer your question properly, I'd need to know a little bit more:

    - what type of printing do you do?
    - what's your highest screening?
    - what annual plate volume do you use (square meters, or # and size of plates)
    - do you know which Kodak plate they recommend?
    - where are you located?

    (you can send that by private message or email if you don't want to post it publicly)

    We don't usually sell the Gecko processor ourselves, mostly because we have others under our brand that fulfill the same needs. It's a decent machine, and qualified for some of our plates, but not all. The data above will help me confirm it's a good fit for your needs.

    Kevin.
    Kevin Cazabon / kevin.cazabon@kodak.com
    Link on Facebook, Plaxo and LinkedIn. Twitter: PlatesAreUs

  6. #6
    kwalker is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Rockville, MD
    Posts
    1

    Default

    The Trendsetter is a very good device. I would also consider any of the Screen boxes. Either way, you owe it to yourself to take a look at the Agfa Azura TS plate. No processor necessary, just a gum unit. For my money the best plate on the market. Benefits of an environmental plate and the performance of conventional ctp.

  7. #7
    bharatk is offline Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    New Delhi, INDIA
    Posts
    34

    Default

    If you going to be a production house, any reason why you are not looking at the TS800. You will get 28 x 40 plates customers too.

    As kwalker mentioned check out the screen boxes too.

  8. #8
    nshadab is offline Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    44

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bharatk View Post
    If you going to be a production house, any reason why you are not looking at the TS800. You will get 28 x 40 plates customers too.

    As kwalker mentioned check out the screen boxes too.
    yes i am researching on that. Thats really a great advise...as most the OFFSET in my city works on Planita,

    do you own any CTP machine presently? if yes which one and why?

  9. #9
    nshadab is offline Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    44

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kevin@Kodak View Post
    I understand - I would never have said they're bad of course... but if I thought that, I simply wouldn't have commented in the first place.

    Do you know which plate type they're recommending? To answer your question properly, I'd need to know a little bit more:

    - what type of printing do you do?
    - what's your highest screening?
    - what annual plate volume do you use (square meters, or # and size of plates)
    - do you know which Kodak plate they recommend?
    - where are you located?

    (you can send that by private message or email if you don't want to post it publicly)

    We don't usually sell the Gecko processor ourselves, mostly because we have others under our brand that fulfill the same needs. It's a decent machine, and qualified for some of our plates, but not all. The data above will help me confirm it's a good fit for your needs.

    Kevin.
    Kevin, thanks for your input.

    I am working closely with KODAK people. And tomm i have a visit to their demo center. Then i'll ask these questions to them and will put in here....i'll put them public..so if anyone other looking for such information may be benefited of.

    wait for a day or 2, i'll update the thread with required info.

  10. #10
    Kevin@Kodak's Avatar
    Kevin@Kodak is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Rochester, NY, USA
    Posts
    240

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nshadab View Post
    Kevin, thanks for your input.

    I am working closely with KODAK people. And tomm i have a visit to their demo center. Then i'll ask these questions to them and will put in here....i'll put them public..so if anyone other looking for such information may be benefited of.

    wait for a day or 2, i'll update the thread with required info.
    Make sure to say hi to the Kodak team there for me then - they're a great bunch and will take good care of you. I was supposed to be there later this month to speak at a conference, but unfortunately have to cancel (a colleague will take my place).

    Kevin.
    Kevin Cazabon / kevin.cazabon@kodak.com
    Link on Facebook, Plaxo and LinkedIn. Twitter: PlatesAreUs


Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Sponsors

Esko Sponsored Content