Go Back   PrintPlanet.com > Digital Printing > Digital Printing Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 12-18-2008, 05:37 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 81
Question Yellow Dots on Xerox Digital Prints

We run a Xerox 5000 Digital Press and every copy we print has a very feint yellow dot structure in the background - we are told this is some sort of security device to show which machine has printed the sheet?

Does anyone else have any more info on this (check the white/ non printed areas of your sheet with a linen tester to see if you too have this). Do other makes of Digital Press also do this? i.e Canon, Konica etc etc.

Any info would be appreciated.

Lee.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 12-18-2008, 06:30 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 297
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by leetaylor View Post
We run a Xerox 5000 Digital Press and every copy we print has a very feint yellow dot structure in the background - we are told this is some sort of security device to show which machine has printed the sheet?

Does anyone else have any more info on this (check the white/ non printed areas of your sheet with a linen tester to see if you too have this). Do other makes of Digital Press also do this? i.e Canon, Konica etc etc.

Any info would be appreciated.

Lee.
As I understand it , this is a voluntary arrangement "requested" by the US Secret Service, i.e. as an anti-counterfeiting measure. I know that Xerox and Konica have implemented this and I believe that all other major manufacturers have also. There's loads of information about this, including "decoding the dots", just google it.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 12-18-2008, 08:33 PM
rsands's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 52
Default

they are security dots that only appear in colour prints. Xerox have an issue on some machines were the dots are too visible...they say they are fixing it...but i doubt they will. i have two complaints logged about them being far too visible...technicians from Xerox agreed...but head office dont seem to care
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 12-18-2008, 11:56 PM
gordo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Victoria, BC, Canada
Posts: 897
Default

EFF: DocuColor Tracking Dot Decoding Guide
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 12-19-2008, 04:17 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 127
Default

Argh, hate that steganography. Can look very bad on light blue and cyan, especially gradients - makes it very green, and sometimes just shows up real bad on what's meant to be a white background.

That's besides the point, they shouldn't be adding 'features' like that. What people print with their printers is their business - how would you feel if you bought a car that tracked everywhere you went, just incase the government might need to know?

Check out Seeing Yellow if you're interested.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 12-19-2008, 08:24 AM
Craig's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 883
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by che.c View Post
That's besides the point, they shouldn't be adding 'features' like that. What people print with their printers is their business - how would you feel if you bought a car that tracked everywhere you went, just incase the government might need to know?
That all good, but when idiots are printing $100 bills it kind of changes the tune. It's the same as Photoshop, I can't recall exactly but I thought Adobe will not allow you to print images of currency.
Some tech. from Canon told me that the digital devices will also record date and time of when a currency (or similar image) is printed.

Gotta love big brother!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 12-19-2008, 09:03 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 127
Default

Yeah I've heard that argument before, and there's no way in hell that a digital press would produce a convincing note (cracking? quality?) never mind one that would pass even the most cursory tests. There will always be some bad eggs, they will still be caught without intrusive steganography. Even then, that's not the point.

The printer was sold to you to print things. You can print what you like and it's not the government's, or the manufacturer's responsibility to trace what you print, or censor it. There is no reason to do it beyond, 'because they can' and taking a bit more freedom and privacy away from joe average.

Erherm, sorry but steganography really annoys me.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 12-19-2008, 09:09 AM
PDeuth's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Connecticut, USA
Posts: 27
Send a message via MSN to PDeuth
Default

I had no idea...Thanks for the information. Personally, I have mixed feelings about this. As a quality manager I don't like not being able to control my processes. If a customer finds that pattern objectionable, there is nothing I can do about it. Tiny yellow dots to help against counterfeiting? I wonder about that idea - the output of those machines in the "Seeing Yellow" list is poor. Anybody duped by currency printed on those machies almost deserves to be scammed.
This is an interesting subject, to be sure, and one that is new to me. Thanks for the information and post.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 12-19-2008, 09:35 AM
Vee Vee is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 203
Default It's wrong!

I think it is wrong. Period.

The US government has their hands into too many things. Their sole purpose was to be here to protect us. Now they want to tell us what we can do, what we can and can't say, and what we can PRINT! Get out of here!!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 12-19-2008, 01:06 PM
Craig's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 883
Default

Be careful........ the men in dark sunglasses are monitoring this. Crap there is a black helicopter flying over now!!!!!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump

Sponsors




Job Postings from JobsTheyWant
Solutions Finishing and Controls Engineer at Hewlett Packard in Corvallis, OR
Digital Indigo Press Operator at O'Neil Data Systems in Los Angeles, CA
Managed Print Services Sales Executive at Meredith Corporation in Des Moines, Iowa
Key Accounts Technical Color Mgmt Specialist at GMG Americas in Hingham, MA
Account Manager - Commercial Sales at NewPage Corporation in Southeast ( Charlotte, Atlanta, Jacksonville )
Account Manager-Commercial Sales at NewPage Corporation in Northeast (New York, Baltimore, Washington)
Account Manager Commercial Sales at NewPage Corporation in Midwest (Chicago,Dallas,Kansas City, Minneapolis
Services Business Development Manager at Electronics for Imaging in Foster City
WhatTheyThink.com Latest Industry News
Print CEO: Premier Print Holdings, operating as Premier Graphics, in liquidation
Océ named "Green Reprographer of the Year" 3rd time
Print CEO: Disrupting the Power of Print
Two more Q.I. press controls products added to patent infringement case
Kodak introduces TRILLIAN SP Thermal Plates
Roland DG to showcase new technologies at Sign and Digital UK 2010
HP issues call for entries in HP Indigo Digital Printing Contest
Going Green: Congratulations to the latest SGP printer: Coating Excellence International
2010 call for nominations for education excellence awards
Enfocus brings innovative solutions to Ipex 2010


Print CEO
Links, information, analysis and commentary from various industry resources.

WhatTheyThink's Speakers Bureau
Need a speaker for your open house, conference, or special event?

WhatTheyThink's Consulting Services
Business Strategy, Workflow Integration, Sales & Marketing, Custom Research