Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 28 of 28

Thread: Ricoh c901s

  1. #21
    ProC900Man is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    22

    Default

    I have been running 2 Pro C901's for three months daily and both units are about 30K off their first 400K PM cycle. Neither machine has required service and we have not replaced any of the parts in the ORU kit. The C901 seems to just keep going...

  2. #22
    salecha is offline Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    64

    Smile

    Greetings.
    Can we upgrade Konica Minolta c6000 to c7000 or c8000. Thanks.
    Salecha


    Quote Originally Posted by UberTech View Post
    Wow, the 900 has been out for about 5 minutes. As an owner I would hope the mods are retrofit!

  3. #23
    Floken's Avatar
    Floken is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    6

    Default

    If you have too much money wanna throw into the sea, go for Ricoh 901; If you really want to run your printing business KM C7000 or C8000 is the right choise!

  4. #24
    Nagramos is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Floken View Post
    If you have too much money wanna throw into the sea, go for Ricoh 901; If you really want to run your printing business KM C7000 or C8000 is the right choise!
    Could you please explain your statement? We tested the 7000 and the 901, and saw many differences between them. In my opinion, this is not a matter of cost, but of what you are going to print. Those two printers has been developed to different markets needs. For ours, we need a 901.
    Regards!

  5. #25
    viclpp is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    42

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nagramos View Post
    Could you please explain your statement? We tested the 7000 and the 901, and saw many differences between them. In my opinion, this is not a matter of cost, but of what you are going to print. Those two printers has been developed to different markets needs. For ours, we need a 901.
    Regards!
    Same with us, we chose the 901 instead. Very satisfied with this machine.

  6. #26
    fourpaula's Avatar
    fourpaula is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    20

    Default C900 vs C 901

    Anyone upgrade from a C900 to a 901? We have had a 900 for almost 2 years & aren't as pleases as one would hope with it. I have seen the C901 but I couldn't see THAT much of a difference between the 2, other than the obvious lack of fuser oil. My question is, how much better is it really? Is there less down time?

  7. #27
    Happyprinter is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    264

    Default

    Just a quick update on our ongoing 901 issues. It would seem that after a teleconference with techs around the US and Ricoh people in Japan that most 901's are experiencing the same issues as we are having. They decided to change out the Cyan and Magenta developer units to see if that would make a difference with our solids. Same result, solids in both colors extremely bad. Well it now seems that Ricoh/Japan is acknowledging that there is indeed a problem with the solid reproduction in these two units and are currently working on a fix. I will continue to keep you posted on the ongoing solid issue. Good machine if they can get the 2 units printing correctly. As I have stated before, this machine is a work horse. It will eat almost anything you run thru it.

  8. #28
    vwrome is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    37

    Default

    I would take a good look at the Ricoh c651 and c751.They are a very solid machine.


Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Sponsors

Esko Sponsored Content