Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Wheels is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    9

    Default Better to have one vendor or two vendors

    We currently have a Xerox 4110 and a Xerox 700. We are looking at adding additional equipment and are shopping all of the vendors. It seems to me that if we were to purchase equipment from a second vendor (and keep the Xerox's), we would benefit by the additional capabilities and idiosycracies of different equipment rather than strict duplication of what we have. Does anybody have experience with dueling vendors that was either very positive or very negative?

  2. #2
    Craig's Avatar
    Craig is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    1,253

    Default

    Two for me works very well.

  3. #3
    SnappySteve's Avatar
    SnappySteve is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    237

    Default

    Two vendors works - in theory it helps keep both honest as they don't want to lose the "percentage" war on how you divide up impressions between the units. When the tech tells you "It will be some time tomorrow afternoon", just tell him you'll switch everything to the competition's machinery so he can just take his time

  4. #4
    TheProcessIStheproduct is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    159

    Default

    yes I like the idea of two, the economies that the vendors talk about having one vendor are largely puffery to sell you more crap...


Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Sponsors

Esko Sponsored Content