Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: PC for Prepress

  1. #1
    Trimmer is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    38

    Default PC for Prepress

    Hello anyone can tell me what kind of pc should i choose to work in prepress and Graphic design,!
    Should i choose the lcd monitor or crt (now i'm using crt monitor 21')?
    What kind of performance are the best to choose?and the brand of pc
    I used to use xp as operating system and vista too but since my pc is not to fast
    i use xp.
    Any suggestions
    Last edited by Trimmer; 09-27-2009 at 04:03 PM. Reason: rct///crt

  2. #2
    mattbeals's Avatar
    mattbeals is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Edmonds, WA
    Posts
    1,127

    Default

    Doesn't really matter what brand of computer it is. A quad core and a fast SATA-II (3Gb/sec) drive should be enough. As for memory, that depends on whether you want to stick with Windows XP or move to Vista. If you stick with Windows XP Pro then you are stuck with a maximum of 4GB of RAM. But only 3.25GB should actually be available to you. If you go with Windows XP Pro 64bit edition then you can use more memory. But you'll have driver problems. So maybe going to Vista is the smartest choice. So look to Windows Vista Business editions and you can go well beyond 4GB. So seriously think about going to Vista, getting more than 4GB of RAM and at least four cores. The brand is really irrelevant.
    Matt Beals

  3. #3
    rbailleu's Avatar
    rbailleu is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    illinois
    Posts
    846

    Default

    mattbeals is right on target. I would stick with xp pro and 4 gb ram for now. and wait out windows 7 introduction. there are still some arguement weather lcd can be accurate for some people. for most people a good lcd is fine. you can buy a cheapp 22 inch lcd for under $200. a good 24 inch for under $400.

  4. #4
    mattbeals's Avatar
    mattbeals is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Edmonds, WA
    Posts
    1,127

    Default

    I had forgotten about Windows 7. I hear it's better than Vista. But the advantage to Vista, at least at this point, is we know what's wrong with Vista. With Windows 7 we have to discover what's wrong with it. If you're installing current software then odds are pretty good that Windows 7 will work fine. It does have a "windows XP compatibility mode" for those rogue apps that don't like 7. But that mode kind of defeats the point of Windows 7. But again, we all know what's wrong with XP, even with SP3. We've got a pretty good idea of what's *not wrong* (notice the inverted logic because of how much is wrong) with Windows Vista, and Windows 7 is a crap shoot at this point.
    Matt Beals

  5. #5
    rbailleu's Avatar
    rbailleu is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    illinois
    Posts
    846

    Default

    matt,

    your not one of those ,ugh, mac people are you?

  6. #6
    jeffkin15 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Milwaukee, WI
    Posts
    95

    Default

    nothing wrong with macs

  7. #7
    mattbeals's Avatar
    mattbeals is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Edmonds, WA
    Posts
    1,127

    Default

    No, I'm a Mac guy through and through who's stuck using Windows XP. Although I am a pragmatist first and foremost. Windows has evolved as have the creative applications and supporting software to really negate the Mac vs. PC debate as to which platform is superior for graphics. It's an equal game. The religious wars are left to the consumer market and the corporate desktop. But for our purposes it is a wash.

    Having said that... Windows Vista is a royal cluster f**k. Windows 7 is what Vista was supposed to be.
    Last edited by mattbeals; 09-28-2009 at 11:34 PM.
    Matt Beals

  8. #8
    Keith's Avatar
    Keith is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    215

    Default

    I'm glad I stumbled upon this thread as I am looking to build a new workstation to drive my printers. After some research, I am scared to death of Vista. All my machines have drivers for it but not all my software will cooperate with it. I just simply do not want to deal with that headache. As Matt Beals said, I will wait for Windows 7 and then switch to Vista ('cause we'll have it figured out by then!)!

    I would love to build a Mac workstation but I hate the print driver windows with all its stupid drop-down menus. Right now, we design on a Mac and print with a PC.

  9. #9
    rbailleu's Avatar
    rbailleu is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    illinois
    Posts
    846

    Default

    I just had this pc verses mac arguement with my cousins over the week end. one cousin has a mac and is not in the graphic arts industry. he just likes iphoto etc. while I am not a big mac person. I will readily admit apple has excellent software. the iphone is a killer product. mac's have a lot of neat features. I just cant see paying the apple penalty for the neat stuff. there is also a reason a lot of rips are run on windows servers. I have not ever had an xp issue. I dont use vista for any work machines. I have never had an issue with vista at home. I have never personnally seen any real problems with vista. I have seen some 3rd party programs that were not updated to work with vista but that happens on the mac too.

  10. #10
    lfelton is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    418

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rbailleu View Post
    mattbeals is right on target. I would stick with xp pro and 4 gb ram for now. and wait out windows 7 introduction. there are still some arguement weather lcd can be accurate for some people. for most people a good lcd is fine. you can buy a cheapp 22 inch lcd for under $200. a good 24 inch for under $400.
    Hmmm... I'd argue that's false economy. We use hardware calibrated Eizo monitors in prepress / artwork which cost a lot more than that, but they're worth every penny. When you have to know that the colours your artworkers see match the proofs, match the press, saving a few bucks on an inaccurate monitor is a bad idea.

    Totally agree on the quad core, CS4 crashes much faster on our newer machines


Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Sponsors

Esko Sponsored Content