Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 66
Like Tree7Likes

Thread: Ink transfer and paper curl

  1. #21
    Alois Senefelder's Avatar
    Alois Senefelder is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    585

    Default *******

    Hello fellow Lithographers and Messrs. Green Printer, Al Ferrari and Lukew.


    Paper Curl

    What you are seeing is - A) Back Edge Curl

    B) cause: Blanket Adhesion, due to lack of moisture lubrication.

    A PDF - Paper Curl with the grain and against the grain



    Regards, Alois
    Attached Files Attached Files
    Last edited by Alois Senefelder; 07-16-2012 at 08:25 AM. Reason: Spacing !

  2. #22
    Al Ferrari is online now Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,023

    Default

    Cobalt 12% at 1.50 percent
    Cobalt 12 percent at 1.50 percent
    Cobalt 12% at 1.50%

    Are these three totally different pieces of information? Just what is the Cobalt content of such an ink from anyone of those statements? Are we to multiply .12 by .015?

    You need to ask your ink manufacturer to provide information in plain language.

    Al

  3. #23
    Green Printer is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    448

    Default

    Al
    This link has the dryer info.

    Coatings & Inks: Driers for Printing Inks

  4. #24
    Sustainable is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    82

    Default

    Green printer was alcohol sub used with the high voc fountain solution?

  5. #25
    Lukew is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    329

    Default

    So which fountain solution ran without incident, and what are your thoughts as to why?

  6. #26
    Green Printer is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    448

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sustainable View Post
    Green printer was alcohol sub used with the high voc fountain solution?
    Yes an alcohol sub was used at 4 oz per gallon. The sub was 85% VOC. The fountain solution used was at 4 oz per gallon. The FS was 45% voc.

    .85 x 4 oz = 3.4 oz
    .45 x 4 oz = 1.8 oz
    The run had 5.2 oz per gallon of 2-Butoxyethanol VOC's in the fountain solution water.
    Last edited by Green Printer; 07-17-2012 at 06:25 AM.

  7. #27
    D Ink Man is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    521

    Default

    The high voc fountain solution ran without issue. We're all trying to pry this out of Green.

    私が試してどんなに一生懸命、時に � �それを取得していない人はありま � ��。

  8. #28
    Erik Nikkanen is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Toronto Ontario Canada
    Posts
    981

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Green Printer View Post
    Al as you surmised the paper curl was a big clue. If the sheet had curled up and not down we would have known instantly that it was the paper picking up water.
    Interesting discussion which I am trying to follow.

    Question and clarification. How do you define the curl direction up or down?

    From what I have seen, if one wets paper with water on one side, the paper will curl away from that surface. Water tending to elongate the paper fibers. When it dries, it tends to recover some what. Is this curl defined as up or down?

    Also if one runs paper over a small roller or a sharp edge, it will give it a curl away from the surface where there is a mechanical stretch of the fibers. Is this up or down curl?

    Thanks for any clarification.

  9. #29
    DotBox is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    23

    Default

    The old printing adage is "eliminate the variables". You altered something and now are having problems.

    If everything but the fount is the same, and you now have a problem when you didn't before, you already know what the immediate cause is. Finding a workable solution shouldn't be very hard at all. I would personally try adjusting the mix so I could temporarily, at least, run less water overall...which is what you should be doing anyway in most cases. As you most likely already know, the least amount of ink and water necessary to run the job at proper density is always the best condition, for curl, drying, prevention of set-off, everything. It's even cheaper by a miniscule amount.

    You could also try a different ink if you've got something available, or adjust the tack of your usual ink with body gum or reducer, to make your your ink a bit more compatible with your current solution mix. In a generic, hypothetical case, and depending on what you suspect is the mostly likely cause of the curl, ink or water, you could probably increase tack and run with a lower water setting, or decrease tack and run the water a little faster, depending on conditions and the kind of image you're trying to print.

    All larger-format sheetfed printing presses print much better when the grain is running across the press. Anyone who's been running a press for a decade or more should have seen that for themselves many, many times by now. It generally produces less curl and much better fit. Parent sizes and bindery concerns can often take priority over what the press/operator might prefer, unfortunately, and on single color black, fit certainly isn't a factor. But even then, running the grain across the width of the press ("long-grain" on the actual press sheet) is still ideal. Judging from the sheet size used in this case, the grain would appear to be correct, so that probably isn't it.

    I think we sometimes try to be TOO technical about this stuff. What works this time may not work at all next time, and the reason could be something as simple as humidity in the pressroom. I think the better plan is to have an arsenal of practical experience and knowledge from which to draw on, such that you've always got something else to try that could realistically cure an unusual problem.

    In the good ol' days, we'd have just cranked the IPA up to about 30% and then run less solution overall, and it would usually come out looking, running and drying great...and flat. Also, if you've got curl at the tail, you could always try feathering the packing to make the sheet release more gradually. That's usually not worth the effort on shorter runs, but on a 26K run it could be. I haven't had to do that myself in years though, since I started running presses with decurlers.

    Understanding technology is great and important, yes. But in this case, all you're really trying to do is get through a job so you can move on to the next. You probably don't need to spend two extra hours investigating what exactly is going wrong, when all you need to do is try one or two quick-fixes that might take ten minutes total and may not even be necessary next time you run the job.

  10. #30
    Al Ferrari is online now Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,023

    Default

    Hi Erik,

    If a seasoned engineer can't tell up from down, we are in serious trouble. ;-)

    But taking you seriously: the curl direction terms are used here in connection with a real press event. Particularly the arrival of the sheets at the press delivery pile printed side up. Curl "down" describes the shape of the sheet, in the delivery, with the corners or edges being lower than the center of the sheet. Curl "up" would be the opposite.

    Note that this use of the terms does not involve the cause of this effect. That's what the discussion is trying to determine.

    Al


Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Sponsors