Quote:
Originally Posted by David Dodd
I don't mean to harp on a point unnecessarily, but I think it's important to clarify the meaning of a few terms. Takt time is a pacing mechanism. It is not intended to be a measure of the time spent performing a particular process or all of the processes required for a particular job. Takt time tells you the pace at which you must produce a particular product in order to meet customer demand. So, for example, if you must produce 16 widgets per day to meet customer demand and you have 8 hours of production time each day assigned to making those widgets, then your takt time for that product is 30 minutes. All this means is that, on average, you must produce one widget every 30 minutes in order to meet customer demand.
The time actually spent performing the activities that are required to produce a product is cycle time. Suppose, for example, that a particular job requires three prepress activities - preflighting, imposition, and plate imaging. If an operator spends 15 minutes preflighting this job, then the preflighting cycle time is 15 minutes. If imposition requires 10 minutes and plate imaging requires 15 minutes, then the total prepress cycle time for this job would be 40 minutes.
Througput time is the total chronological time that it takes to move a product through the production process or through a portion of the process. Suppose, for example, that the job described in the previous paragraph was delivered to prepress at 9 am and that plates for the job were delivered to the pressroom at 12 noon. In that case, the prepress throughput time for the job would be three hours.
The main point I want to make is that takt time is not a measure of the actual time required to produce a product or perform a process. Takt time is the pace at which you must produce in order to meet customer demand.
|
After careful analysis of David's explanation, I understand what he is trying to get across and I will agree with his analysis.
A potential better way to handle what you are trying to do would be to analyze what is going on in order to create "work cells".
A work cell is "an arrangement of resources in a manufacturing environment to improve the quality, speed and cost of the process."
Creating a system that no matter if a job is hot or not you have a specific infrastructure in place to handle the changing environment that we call printing. The whole idea of a work cell is to have the specific team cross-functional. This might be a bit of a stretch for pre-press because of its need to focus on one project at a time, but creating a system that can improve on the resources used, the quality of the work, the speed and the cost of the process could benefit from this.
It could be your CSR's and pre-press guys are in the same room, right next to each other. Or maybe its rearranging how pre-press are working. Again, there are many ways to handle this, and the more data you have and the more input that is presented the better off you'll be in creating a more efficient process.