Go Back   PrintPlanet.com > Production & Operations Management > Lean Manufacturing

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-25-2009, 12:50 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 141
Default ThinkTech printing system

Anyone have any experience with this Green initiative printing system?

Sounds good, and I have seen one of our books, printed in this manner, come back with great results. The 1-color art had a wide rage of values and subtle details, printed on uncoated stock and looked pretty dam good.

Any drawbacks?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-26-2009, 05:37 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 141
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gregg View Post
Anyone have any experience with this Green initiative printing system?

Sounds good, and I have seen one of our books, printed in this manner, come back with great results. The 1-color art had a wide rage of values and subtle details, printed on uncoated stock and looked pretty dam good.

Any drawbacks?
NONE!!!

Over 17 years starting with the first generation.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-26-2009, 07:05 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gregg View Post
Anyone have any experience with this Green initiative printing system?

Sounds good, and I have seen one of our books, printed in this manner, come back with great results. The 1-color art had a wide rage of values and subtle details, printed on uncoated stock and looked pretty dam good.

Any drawbacks?
I would assume there would be constraints to the process itself. Granted, since this was developed by the Maple-Vail Book Manufacturing Club the constraint is within books, assuming all other work wouldn't be able to use this system. I have read a few places where they compare the quality to sheetfed presses, but I wouldn't bet the Komori 5C+AQ press at my shop with that notion. There are specific applications to this, mostly within web-based printing.

What I would say is this:

1) Are you happy with the processes claim of reducing VOCs?
2) Are you happy with the product that has come out of the process?
3) Is the cost right?

If all are yes, hell don't look for drawbacks :P
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-26-2009, 08:18 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 141
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mattf View Post
I would assume there would be constraints to the process itself. Granted, since this was developed by the Maple-Vail Book Manufacturing Club the constraint is within books, assuming all other work wouldn't be able to use this system. I have read a few places where they compare the quality to sheetfed presses, but I wouldn't bet the Komori 5C+AQ press at my shop with that notion. There are specific applications to this, mostly within web-based printing.

What I would say is this:

1) Are you happy with the processes claim of reducing VOCs?
2) Are you happy with the product that has come out of the process?
3) Is the cost right?

If all are yes, hell don't look for drawbacks :P

What is your experience with this process?
Have you ever used it?
If you haven't used it how do you know?

This is a constant problem assuming. If you haven't used or been involved in the R+D of a process or manufacturing method all you are doing is making an assumption and nothing more.

Recently we had a trainer in our facility. He asked about conductivity. The press crew said they don't have to check it because it is a printing myth and assumption. The trainer commented that it should be below 2000 mho for the offset process to work correctly. The crew said go ahead and check, it read at over 7000 mho. The trainer watched us run all day.
Conductivity is one of many assumptions and myths' in this industry.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-26-2009, 09:27 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Green Printer View Post
What is your experience with this process?
Have you ever used it?
If you haven't used it how do you know?

This is a constant problem assuming. If you haven't used or been involved in the R+D of a process or manufacturing method all you are doing is making an assumption and nothing more.

Recently we had a trainer in our facility. He asked about conductivity. The press crew said they don't have to check it because it is a printing myth and assumption. The trainer commented that it should be below 2000 mho for the offset process to work correctly. The crew said go ahead and check, it read at over 7000 mho. The trainer watched us run all day.
Conductivity is one of many assumptions and myths' in this industry.
As I had originally said, if Gregg sees no difference with the process within his printed work what is the point in trying to find drawbacks? If he is happy with it then there shouldn't be any issue.

The only assumption I made was that this system was created by a book publisher. With that the process was designed for book creation. I bet you could bring this over to other processes but that doesn't mean its applicable. Web-based printing and offset are completely different worlds within runs size + customer base.

Conductivity isn't a myth, its a consistent issue that is very much important to printers. Both conductivity and pH use to be the main focus, but because of technology the fountain solution is buffered to such an extent that it keeps pH at a consistent amount. How you ran at 7000mho is beyond me without being there, but there is always an explanation. And just because you run at 7000mho doesn't mean another printer can. Many factors have to be taken into consideration, and many factors become unique to each printer such as water supply and the treatment method itself.

I think we are not in the right section of the forums for this discussion :P
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump

Sponsors

Job Postings from JobsTheyWant
Solutions Finishing and Controls Engineer at Hewlett Packard in Corvallis, OR
Digital Indigo Press Operator at O'Neil Data Systems in Los Angeles, CA
Managed Print Services Sales Executive at Meredith Corporation in Des Moines, Iowa
Key Accounts Technical Color Mgmt Specialist at GMG Americas in Hingham, MA
Account Manager - Commercial Sales at NewPage Corporation in Southeast ( Charlotte, Atlanta, Jacksonville )
Account Manager-Commercial Sales at NewPage Corporation in Northeast (New York, Baltimore, Washington)
Account Manager Commercial Sales at NewPage Corporation in Midwest (Chicago,Dallas,Kansas City, Minneapolis
Services Business Development Manager at Electronics for Imaging in Foster City
WhatTheyThink.com Latest Industry News
Printing Office: Brace for Storm in Paper Availability, Says Merchant
Schawk sales up, profit in Q4
GASC partners with Cal Poly for Graph Expo 2010 conference
New Presstek 75DI press will be on display at IPEX
EskoArtwork to roll out Suite 10 at IPEX 2010
Peer Groups: Case Study on Creating a Team Environment
MindFireInc Webinar: Social Media an Integral Part of Cross Media Marketing
Adlam Films introduces a high quality film at reduced cost
Enfocus announces availability of new Switch 09 configurators
Sun Chemical becomes UK sponsor for Colorgreen ink disposal initiative


Print CEO
Links, information, analysis and commentary from various industry resources.

WhatTheyThink's Speakers Bureau
Need a speaker for your open house, conference, or special event?

WhatTheyThink's Consulting Services
Business Strategy, Workflow Integration, Sales & Marketing, Custom Research