Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 46
Like Tree11Likes

Thread: Quark Memorial Service

  1. #31
    Mark's Avatar
    Mark is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    186

    Default

    That was annoying (we also have the 6500) but was fixed in 8.

  2. #32
    naplajoie2000's Avatar
    naplajoie2000 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Loveland, OH
    Posts
    18

    Default

    Badmouth Quark! I have worked prep for 20 yrs, and Q4 was the last version that was worth a damn. As I deal with client files and do not design, I have seen every version of InDesign since its beginning. We laughed when they tried to tell us ID was going to take over Quarks place at the top. ID 1.0 was terrible, and ID 2.0 wasn't much better. Then the CS suite started and then we saw the difference. Updating images, dealing with transparency, exporting pdf files, all became much simpler, and more reliable. Every version of Quark since 5 has been a headache for prep guys. I have worked in Rampage and Esko environments, and Adobe apps just work better for our purposes. We deal with every major agency, and they have all transitioned to Adobe. So to say that the rest of the world is using Quark is just wrong. And for car brochure data, we print for many car makers, and they all use Adobe...and love it. We have 1 client that still uses Quark, and that client apologizes every year they send us files with it.

    So, IMHO, you are the one that probably should step into the 21st century and get on board the train, before getting run over by the printer who starts charging you a penalty for just thinking of using Quark.

  3. #33
    Sev
    Sev is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    106

    Default

    I have worked with Quark since version 3.32. Since we were also getting PageMaker files, Quark looked pretty good. This and using our RIP50 on our Lino 330. Then came the release of Quark 4. We did the upgrade to version 4, and found it to be a huge improvement over 3.32. However, many people on the Quark forums found version 4 to be buggy. We had no problems, and I was very vocal on how much we liked version 4. Because of that, Quark contacted me and wanted to use me and the company I work with, as a testimonial for Quark 4, on the Quark website. I was proud and thrilled, to say the least. Then Quark called me up, and wanted to do an interview for an ad for Quark 4, in Macworld Magazine. Quark had me featured in a 2 page ad. Of course when Quark 5 was released, we jumped right to the upgrade. A couple of our customers started to use InDesign, and we had to turn down those jobs. Soon we realized we were going to have to get InDesign (version 1.5). I hated using it, and many jobs were not working properly, and not output film properly. The upgrade to version 2 wasnt much better. But we were slowly getting more and more InDesign files. We still laughed when Adobe said InDesign was going to be the Quark killer. We upgraded to Quark version 6.5, and kept laughing, until Adobe came out with CS. All of a sudden, InDesign didnt look so bad. We started getting fewer and fewer Quark files. By the time CS3 was around, Quark was all but gone in our shop. We are still only up to Quark 6.5, and that is as far as we will go with Quark. With CS5, most of our customers have upgraded to CS5. We have only one customer left who uses Quark, so we ask for PDF files. Lets face it, Adobe made Quark who they were, because of PageMaker, and Adobe has made Quark who they are today, with InDesign, and the CS suite.
    That's my 2.5 cents worth.

    -Sev
    Helmet_of_Poe likes this.

  4. #34
    Al Ferrari is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    739

    Default

    "Lets face it, Adobe made Quark who they were, because of PageMaker,"

    If you mean that PageMaker's performance made Quark look very good, you should be thanking Aldous. Adobe did not acquire it till much later on.

    Al
    Lukas Engqvist likes this.

  5. #35
    Sev
    Sev is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    106

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Al Ferrari View Post
    "Lets face it, Adobe made Quark who they were, because of PageMaker,"

    If you mean that PageMaker's performance made Quark look very good, you should be thanking Aldous. Adobe did not acquire it till much later on.

    Al
    Al, you are correct with that. We never used Aldus PageMaker, I believe we started with Adobe PageMaker 6.0, if I recall. I looked at our software collection today, and could not come up with any older versions of PageMaker, and my memory is not as good as it used be.

    -Sev

  6. #36
    JoeatData's Avatar
    JoeatData is offline Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    33

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JaimeZ View Post
    Quark--R.I.P.

    How long has Quark 9 been on the market? We're at version 8.51. Haven't had the need to upgrade.

  7. #37
    MacTwidget is offline Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Carlsbad, CA
    Posts
    81

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JoeatData View Post
    How long has Quark 9 been on the market? We're at version 8.51. Haven't had the need to upgrade.
    I always try to have at least one copy of the latest and greatest. Because if I don't, Murphy's Law will kick in and a customer will send in a file that I do not have the software for!

    I bought a copy of Quack 9 as soon as it was shipping in April 2011. I have had exactly ONE file from a customer in Quack 9.

  8. #38
    Tpyo is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Reno, NV
    Posts
    7

    Default

    It seems to me a rather obvious issue is being ignored here, so far. Indesign, being a part of Creative Suite, works so well with the other Adobe products within CS. Personally, I tend to treat 'AcroIllyIndy' as one program. I haven't really used Quark since vers. 7. Does it play well with Acrobat and Illustrator? And is it worth the cost to buy each separately?

  9. #39
    GaragePunk is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    5

    Default

    What do you mean, there is Excel, Word and Punisher to contend with.

  10. #40
    Slammer is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    63

    Default

    Hey guys I have used Quark since it was still called Ventura publisher.


Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Sponsors

Esko Sponsored Content