Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15
  1. #11
    kbarz is offline Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    31

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cole View Post
    For the past 6 months we have been printing without IPA. The results have been really good the only problem we now have is that the waters are getting really dirty and we now have to dump it at least twice a week. Are there any ideas as what type of filtration system suits best?
    Is it possible that our fount percentages are not what it should be. We use sustifix on all our presses, CD74 and Sm102 - 4% and XL105 - 3%. We have really good drying and a good water ink balance. Any ideas please guys.
    after going from ipa to not using it you most certanally will need to clean your water lines going from main tank to water pans.. otherwise your conductivity,and ph are going to be offthe charts..we use bleach to get,and keep our lines clean. also a flow clear is money well spent

  2. #12
    Coastline's Avatar
    Coastline is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Lingfield, Surrey, UK
    Posts
    9

    Default

    Hello Cole,

    The first step is to use a decent system flush, we recommend ABC Allied's 2-step system cleaner, A+B Systems Cleaner; it is far more effective than a single solution flush.
    The second step is calcium control, using ABC Allied's Relief.
    Finally, as you know, water cleanliness is of the upmost importance, especially when printing without IPA. We recommend a compact filtration unit to all of our IPA-free customers, the single multi-stage filter is easy to maintain and highly effective.
    If you need any more information, just let me know.

    Quote Originally Posted by cole View Post
    For the past 6 months we have been printing without IPA. The results have been really good the only problem we now have is that the waters are getting really dirty and we now have to dump it at least twice a week. Are there any ideas as what type of filtration system suits best?
    Is it possible that our fount percentages are not what it should be. We use sustifix on all our presses, CD74 and Sm102 - 4% and XL105 - 3%. We have really good drying and a good water ink balance. Any ideas please guys.

  3. #13
    cole is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    23

    Default

    Hey coastline , if you could supply me with more info that would be great.

  4. #14
    Coastline's Avatar
    Coastline is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Lingfield, Surrey, UK
    Posts
    9

    Default

    Hi Cole,

    I hope you received the further information I sent.
    For anyone else's interest, please find a basic video regarding quick and easy filtration below;

    Simple Filtration:


    Quote Originally Posted by cole View Post
    Hey coastline , if you could supply me with more info that would be great.

  5. #15
    samirsasa234 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    3

    Default

    we use Baldwin basic liner , is it effective on chemistry coloration and calcium contamination......


Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Sponsors

Esko Sponsored Content