Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 18 of 18
  1. #11
    Happyprinter is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    264

    Default

    We to run VDP thru our Fiery almost everyday to our 901. No problems at all.

  2. #12
    Shaja is offline Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Pewaukee, WI
    Posts
    43

    Default

    I work for an independent Konica Minolta dealer and we sell and support PrintShop Mail to clients in our territory. I've actively used PrintShop Mail as part of my job for 8 years. We used to be a Ricoh dealer at one time, so I've run my own PSM jobs on a good variety of machines from both manufacturers.

    My go-to work-around for slow ripping was taught to me by an Atlas PrintShop Mail technician many years ago (pre Atlas/Objectif Lune merger). He told me to print the job as a pdf, then send the pdf to the printer. Granted, that defeats PSM's minimizing network traffic feature, but his tip reliably works for me.

    You also may want to visit Objectif Lune's PrintShop Mail forum and post your question there. OL staff are pretty good about answering questions promptly, and they can help if you need to open a support ticket. Objectif Lune Tech Support Self Help - Forums powered by UBB.threads™
    Last edited by Shaja; 06-10-2011 at 09:00 AM. Reason: Explain background better

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    50

    Default

    Paula, I think you may be confusing RIP speed with merge speed.

    Any VDP application needs to first merge all records before they can be ripped. Objectif Lune products have never been known for being overly speedy in the merge department.

    Certainly you can optimize the data stream sent to the RIP to speed the RIP process. However, without a VDP job being first completely processed there is no way to insure there are no data errors.

    As for running high volume of Direct Smile files, good luck with that. If you don't have a huge number of variables you might want to simply consider generating the different images, saving and calling them as variable graphics.

    Good luck.

  4. #14
    msaeger's Avatar
    msaeger is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    175

    Default

    Do you know if your Fiery is up to date on system software and all the patches?
    Warning I am a Ricoh tech.

  5. #15
    msaeger's Avatar
    msaeger is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    175

    Default

    Here are the specs for the standard Fiery for the c900.

    Fiery System Version Fiery System 8 Release 2
    CPU Intel Core 2 Duo 2.16GHz
    Memory 2GB(1GBx2)
    HDD 500GB (250GB x 2/ RAID 0)
    CD-ROM Drive Not Supported
    Operating System Windows XP

    Where are you seeing how much RAM you have?
    Warning I am a Ricoh tech.

  6. #16
    fourpaula's Avatar
    fourpaula is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    20

    Default

    Interesting. If I look under "My Computer" on the fiery it says 2GB BUT if I look within the software (Command Workstation 5) it says 512mg. I was told that if the system had more memory it wouldn't recognize it anyway.
    We went through 4 months of craziness with updates both software & hardware when we first got our C900. Last patch was done about 6 months ago.
    I spoke with Print Shop Mail about the sending it to the printer issue. It was suggested that I try making the file into a PDF first & try to reduce the image size. A 2500 page PDf doesn't seem practical but I'll have to test it. I was also informed that I'll have to use good "Time Management". The most irritating part is being unable to do anything else with my computer while it is sending these jobs over to the printer. Even opening outlook while PSM is sending jobs to the printer crashes my computer.
    My computer more than beat the minimum requirements for the software.
    So basically we are dealing with 2 issues that may or may not be related.
    #1 going from computer to printer
    #2 RIP at the printer.

  7. #17
    msaeger's Avatar
    msaeger is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    175

    Default

    Yeah I don't know what portion of the memory is used for what just that it comes with a total of 2 GB. I would guess adding more would screw up something.

    If you print out the Fiery config page it should have 4.0 for the system software version and list a bunch of patches.

    Maybe someone on the official EFI forum could help. http://fieryforums.efi.com/
    Last edited by msaeger; 06-17-2011 at 08:42 PM.
    Warning I am a Ricoh tech.

  8. #18
    Bo3b is offline Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    44

    Default

    from memory the fierys usually partition ram for the system and for the rip. Usually it;s the rip that gets the extra ram.
    I am going back a bit so this might not apply to the newer rips, but on the C: partition (I think) there used to be a boot.ini file which had a setting in it called maxram. This was the amount of memory that the OS would use - put as much ram in the system as you want and the system would not use any more ram than the maxram setting.
    What I used to do was add more ram and double the maxram setting (used to be 256, changed to 512) this would give the os more ram and the rip more ram. usually helped the performance but only up to a point. It got a point where adding more ram made no difference to the performance of the rip or os.
    Faster hard drives would probably help as the fierys rip to memory - compress - save to hard disk - then read from hard disk - decompress to ram then print from ram. so the faster you can get the data to/from the hard drive and the faster you can compress/decompress (remembering that with more memory there is less compression needed) then the better the performance. Obviously a faster processor would also help.

    The boot.ini tip only works for rips that are running windows - the bustled fiery rips run a form of Linux so things are obviously different.


Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Sponsors

Esko Sponsored Content