Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    David F is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    5

    Default software for stochastic screening on my Epson 2880

    I would like to print a stochastic screened image onto transparency film, using my Epson 2880 inkjet printer. I need better quality and control than I can get printing bitmapped images. I've seen one software program called IceFields, but this has to run on a Mac and is a bit pricey.

    Any suggestions? Thanks, David

  2. #2
    Stephen Marsh is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    581

    Default

    What is wrong with the native Epson FM screening? Too fine?

    I was going to suggest IceFields, however you asked for another option. What do you mean better than "bitmapped images"? Photoshop stochastic bitmaps? I only know of one other option without doing a search:

    RASTUS export plugin


    Hope this helps,

    Stephen Marsh

  3. #3
    gordo's Avatar
    gordo is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Victoria, BC, Canada
    Posts
    2,151

    Default

    You could try Andromeda Software's Screens package for both PC and MAC.
    Andromeda Software, Inc. Store

    They don't provide much info on their website, but I have a very old MAC OS 7 version that had some interesting FM-like screen effects with lots of user control. If the latest version is anything like that it might do the trick for you.

    best gordo
    Last edited by gordo; 05-19-2011 at 07:31 PM.

  4. #4
    M&M Displays is offline Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    67

    Default

    What are you using the film for? Burning screens?

  5. #5
    David F is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    5

    Default

    Yes, I'm using it for exposing plates.

    Since I'm on a PC, Icefields won't work. I don't know what you mean by Epson FM screening, but the only way I know of controlling the resolution of the dot pattern on the my desktop printer is to print out at "draft" quality, which doesn't give me the results I want.

    I think of the stochastic screening to be different than bitmapping, and the bitmap option in Photoshop again doesn't give me the control I need.

    I'm considering using this software to create transparencies for exposing polymer plates for printing on an etching press. The idea is the random dot pattern from the stochastic screen, printing onto transparency film, creates a matrix of indentations when you use it to expose the plate, which holds ink, which in turn you use to print onto a sheet of paper, hopefully producing an image with a range of tones.

    Quote Originally Posted by Stephen Marsh View Post
    What is wrong with the native Epson FM screening? Too What do you mean better than "bitmapped images"? Photoshop stochastic bitmaps? I only know of one other option without doing a search:

    RASTUS export plugin
    Last edited by David F; 05-20-2011 at 11:39 AM.

  6. #6
    David F is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    5

    Default

    Thanks Gordo. I heard of this plug in years ago, but at the time I think it only worked for Mac. I'm working off an earlier version of Photoshop, so I've emailed them to see if their plug-in will work with my version.

    Best, David

    Quote Originally Posted by gordo View Post
    You could try Andromeda Software's Screens package for both PC and MAC.
    Andromeda Software, Inc. Store

  7. #7
    Stephen Marsh is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    581

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by David F View Post
    I don't know what you mean by Epson FM screening, but the only way I know of controlling the resolution of the dot pattern on the my desktop printer is to print out at "draft" quality, which doesn't give me the results I want.
    Inkjet printers use a stochastic screening/frequency modulated (FM) screening pattern. The Photoshop diffusion dither bitmap screen is dependent on the image resolution, the higher the resolution the finer the dots.

    Have you had a look at the Rastus plug that I linked in my previous post? It has a demo version available for MS Win or Mac and has been used for similar processes as you intend.

    You will likely need to develop some extreme compensation curves, to hit the data with before turning it into an FM screen (these would probably lighten the image from the midtones to the shadows).


    Best regards,

    Stephen Marsh
    Last edited by Stephen Marsh; 05-20-2011 at 07:06 PM.

  8. #8
    David F is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    5

    Default

    Thanks Stephan, I think I tried Rastus quiet a while ago; I'll look again. Best, David
    Quote Originally Posted by Stephen Marsh View Post
    Have you had a look at the Rastus plug that I linked in my previous post? It has a demo version available for MS Win or Mac and has been used for similar processes as you intend

  9. #9
    graficworx's Avatar
    graficworx is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawaii
    Posts
    129

    Default

    Depending on what type of photopolymer plate you are using they typically range from 90 to 133 line screen, or roughly 1200 to 1800 dpi. You would need to work in this range to get a good image. If you set the printer at max resolution, and then send it a photoshop prepared file that's, for example, 90 line screen, you should get something close to 90 lpi. The printer driver will interpolated down resolution, but never force the resolution higher, only interpret it. In draft mode your probably getting 30 lpi at the max.

  10. #10
    David F is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    5

    Default

    Thanks Graficworx. I'm using Toyobo Printight plates for intaglio-type printing. Usually I use a two-exposure method with an aquatint (e.g. stochastic) screen, then the image transparency.

    I was just considering trying the one-exposure method, which requires that you add the "aquatint" directly to the image. I will try the Rastus program for this--it allows you to set input and output resolutions. So, based on your information, I would set the output resolution to about 1200-1800 dpi?

    Thanks, david
    Quote Originally Posted by graficworx View Post
    Depending on what type of photopolymer plate you are using they typically range from 90 to 133 line screen, or roughly 1200 to 1800 dpi. If you set the printer at max resolution, and then send it a photoshop prepared file that's, for example, 90 line screen, you should get something close to 90 lpi.


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Sponsors

Esko Sponsored Content