Standard Finishing
4Over

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Seeking Full Disclosure: Who was Underwhelmed by PRINT 17?

Collapse
X
Collapse

  • Seeking Full Disclosure: Who was Underwhelmed by PRINT 17?

    By Noel Ward, Editor@Large

    Trying not to be snarkier than usual, I look back on four days at PRINT 17, remembering what it once looked like, thinking about what many I spoke with said about the show, and wondering what universe NPES lives in when they say this show went well.

    To be sure, the educational sessions, on the floor and in meeting rooms, were very good. These are one of the prime reasons for attending a trade show and anyone who goes to a show without taking advantage of these opportunities is not getting the full value of their trip. There are few better places to gain an understanding of the trends in the industry and what they mean to individual businesses. But this story is not about those sessions.

    As of Sept. 18, 2017 the NPES website claims 20,000 people attended the recent show in Chicago. It’s a nice round number but it’s probably not a final tally that will pull out some 4,500 vendor personnel and free-loading press and analysts. At some point we’ll hear how many “real” attendees were on hand—those who actually have a part in buying machinery, equipment or software. When we see that number, we can compare it to the 28,678 who attended PRINT 09. I’m guessing the “real” attendees at PRINT 17 might have reached 16,000. Maybe. Some vendors will also claim that whatever the final tally is, they were “quality” attendees. But on the other hand, I just spoke with one vendor who said he'd be amazed if there were more than 10,000 attendees, noting that head count could be as low as 8,000. I didn't ask, but I'm guessing his company might not be attending next year.

    Some of the decline is a result of a shrinking industry, which is just a fact of life. Some of it comes from the expansion of vendors’ demo centers and the growing practice of vendors doing their own events, often targeting vertical markets. These can bring in prospects and suspects far more effectively than a general purpose print show. Similarly, online software demos reduce the need for some prospects to attend a show. As a couple of vendors in Chicago noted, "We can bring a lot of people to our demo center for a fraction of what we spend here. And close more business.” That's hardly breaking news, but it's a fact that show organizers can no longer ignore. "We spend money on these shows to generate new leads," said one vendor. "We didn't see that."

    So OK, I know the industry is contracting and some print providers are still having trouble rationalizing large capital expenditures. Many want to see a wide range of equipment and software, especially when they aren’t far enough into a sales cycle to get a free trip to a demo center. But as show traffic shrinks it makes one wonder about the timing of shows and the venues used. Some people I spoke with thought Graph/PRINT should run on a 2-year cycle alternating with drupa. Some said it should be combined with another show, such as SGIA. Or just go to a smaller venue. Others thought it could go away and not be missed.

    Venues Matter

    Show organizers aren’t oblivious to these trends and such thinking, and the shows still represent substantial value to show companies and attendees. But vendors usually measure value in terms of new leads that turn into sales. This is notoriously difficult to accurately measure, but the dollar cost of a show is not. Which is where show companies should be paying attention. There is doubtless a multi-year deal with the unions and McCormick Place to hold Graph Expo and PRINT shows at McCormick, but after 4 days there this year with what sure seemed to be a thin crowd, one has to ask if those plans are really in the best interest of the industry, the vendors and attendees. In my opinion, the smaller the footprint of a formerly big show, the weaker the industry looks, and the fewer people that will attend. It can become a relentless downward spiral. We’ve all seen it before with other shows in this industry.

    Is it time for another venue? Most attendees are probably indifferent about which conference center they go to in a given city, but it may matter to vendors who foot the costs of shipping, drayage and face the rapacious dealings of unions. For vendors, cutting costs is usually a good thing. In Chicago, the other choice is the Stephens Convention Center in Rosemont, adjacent to O’Hare. I’ve been there a couple of times for Labelexpo. It has an odd floor layout and the lighting could be improved, but it could easily contain a show the size of PRINT. There were about 17,400 people at Labelexpo last year and it was far from overfilled. In fact, it felt busy and energized. Finally, when you bear in mind that Graph Expo shows are historically about 75-80% the size of a PRINT show (meaning there will be fewer people wandering the aisles in McCormick next year) another venue starts to make sense.

    The print industry and print trade shows are not about to go away. Over the past decade print providers have adapted to new technologies by adding digital presses and adopting software tools for color management, workflows and more. Print shows have to adapt, too, not just by shrinking but by using venues that make sense for the vendors and attendees. Chicago is the right city and McCormick Place once made sense for a big show, but general purpose print shows just aren’t very big anymore. Time to change it up.

    What do you think?
    Last edited by noelward; 09-21-2017, 03:48 PM.
      Posting comments is disabled.

    Categories

    Collapse

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • An under-the-radar flight pattern for MCS Inc.
      MyWildIrishProse
      by Sean O’Leary

      The first thing Glenn Toole said to me was “We change our world every 4 - 5 years and if we don’t we’re not moving ahead.”

      It was just last week that your PrintPlanet reporter stopped by MCS, Inc.’s Bolingbrook, IL National Demonstration Facility for a follow up chat with Glenn Toole, Vice President Sales & Marketing. This trip was sort of a continuation of a brief Print ’17 booth visit, after which I had been dogged by a feeling that there was more...
      10-12-2017, 09:22 AM
    • Putting the customer at the center
      prwhite
      An interview with the Managing Director of Enfocus
      Some of our members may be aware of changes at Enfocus during this year. As change happens, staff turnover occurs and some new faces emerge. Such has been the case at Enfocus, however the one constant is their ongoing customer support, evident on PrintPlanet posts and by their own, internal customer support. At PRINT-17, our staff had the chance to meet the new Managing Director, Wim Fransen, and discuss his customer-centric focus.
      ...
      09-27-2017, 09:56 AM
    • Seeking Full Disclosure: Who was Underwhelmed by PRINT 17?
      noelward
      By Noel Ward, Editor@Large

      Trying not to be snarkier than usual, I look back on four days at PRINT 17, remembering what it once looked like, thinking about what many I spoke with said about the show, and wondering what universe NPES lives in when they say this show went well.

      To be sure, the educational sessions, on the floor and in meeting rooms, were very good. These are one of the prime reasons for attending a trade show and anyone who goes to a show without taking advantage...
      09-21-2017, 01:59 PM
    • Short-Run Rotary Die-Cutting: More Value and More Margin
      MyWildIrishProse
      By Richard Romano, Industry Analyst

      Printing today is about more than ink on paper. In fact, even saying “ink on paper” is an anachronism, given the bewildering variety of substrates that today’s equipment can print on. Today’s print customers are increasingly looking for ways for what they produce to stand out from other printed items, either in customers’ mailboxes, on store shelves, or any other environment where printed materials are jostling for attention. To that end,...
      08-31-2017, 07:14 AM
    • Automated Cross Platform Color Management is Now a Thing
      MyWildIrishProse
      "What do you want the job to look like, where is it going and what are the rules for mapping out of gamut colors?"

      Sean O’Leary
      Chief Technology Officer | Print Planet

      I was recently involved in producing case studies documenting a half dozen large commercial printers’ installations of high speed production inkjet printers. The featured inkjet models were built by Xerox, Fuji, Ricoh, HP, Konica-Minolta and other major manufacturers and they had been installed...
      08-24-2017, 10:28 AM
    • Noodling with Job Planning and Imposition Software
      MyWildIrishProse
      By Richard Romano, Industry Analyst

      I once bought a pasta maker. It seemed like a good idea at the time. I mean, I like pasta (it’s part of the heritage, after all!), and fresh, restaurant-quality pasta is one of life’s great delights. However, since I do not actually run a restaurant, the pasta maker ended up being more trouble than it was worth. From all the prep work it takes to make the dough to put into the thing, to the elaborate clean-up required, it turned out that just...
      08-16-2017, 08:11 PM
    Working...
    X