Standard Finishing
4Over

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Embedded vs External Fiery Server for printing PDF’s and InDesign

Collapse
Canon
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Joe View Post

    I'm sorry but what is the appeal to having text that cannot be read without a loupe or magnifying glass? Attached is a PDF with text that at 12 pt fills an 8.5 x 11 page but at 1.5 pt is 14 lines that fills about 1" of the page.

    [ATTACH]n276006[/ATTACH]
    I design and sell educational posters for kids and include magnifiers so they can explore the content, repeating patterns, etc.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by CliffSpielman View Post

      I design and sell educational posters for kids and include magnifiers so they can explore the content, repeating patterns, etc.
      Thanks. That clears that up. LOL
      Joe
      OS: Mac OS X 10.10.2 - RIP: Prinergy Connect 6.1 - CTP: Luscher XPose! 160 (2)

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Joe View Post

        I'm sorry but what is the appeal to having text that cannot be read without a loupe or magnifying glass? Attached is a PDF with text that at 12 pt fills an 8.5 x 11 page but at 1.5 pt is 14 lines that fills about 1" of the page.

        [ATTACH]n276006[/ATTACH]
        I printed your test page on my brother printer at home and looked at it using the usb microscope. Here is a picture of that. Not really readable but much better than I thought it would do.
        Attached Files
        Warning I am a Ricoh tech.

        Comment


        • #19
          I don't believe that embedded versus external there should be a quality difference for most applications. RIP time will no doubt suffer. Don't you just have to load Command Workstation on another computer and program the job from there? Perhaps there are some features disabled but I would be surprised if it just dumbed down the print quality itself.

          One thing concerning is the $500/month lease term budget...not sure that you could get a worthwhile machine with service and supplies for that? That doesn't add up. Definitely approach with caution.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by ksherrod View Post
            I don't believe that embedded versus external there should be a quality difference for most applications. RIP time will no doubt suffer. Don't you just have to load Command Workstation on another computer and program the job from there? Perhaps there are some features disabled but I would be surprised if it just dumbed down the print quality itself.

            One thing concerning is the $500/month lease term budget...not sure that you could get a worthwhile machine with service and supplies for that? That doesn't add up. Definitely approach with caution.
            The $500 budget is a goal. One misunderstanding I had is that a sales rep I first spoke to quoted me on machines with no Fiery controller but just whatever native print controller the machines come with. I didn't know enough of that moment. Since then I've been doing more homework. I'm still waiting on pricing with the bustled Fiery, but just for the machines I was quoted 5-year lease payments of $311 for a KM C2060 and $370 for a Canon C650. Both include all the supplies and maintenance needed, but click charges (and Fiery) are extra.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by ksherrod View Post
              I don't believe that embedded versus external there should be a quality difference for most applications. RIP time will no doubt suffer. Don't you just have to load Command Workstation on another computer and program the job from there? Perhaps there are some features disabled but I would be surprised if it just dumbed down the print quality itself.

              One thing concerning is the $500/month lease term budget...not sure that you could get a worthwhile machine with service and supplies for that? That doesn't add up. Definitely approach with caution.
              Sorry, going to have to disagree with you on this one.

              I had 2 of the EXACT same presses, just one with embedded rip and one with external fiery rip. Send the exact same file to both machines and get completely different color. Just for fun I swapped the external fiery for the embedded and printed the job again. The colors between the two machines now magically matched. After that I bought an external fiery for my machine on ebay that matched what I already had and left behind all my color/quality issues going from machine to machine.

              There was a HUGE difference in output between the external vs embedded.

              External fiery every time.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by JustinB View Post

                Sorry, going to have to disagree with you on this one.

                I had 2 of the EXACT same presses, just one with embedded rip and one with external fiery rip. Send the exact same file to both machines and get completely different color. Just for fun I swapped the external fiery for the embedded and printed the job again. The colors between the two machines now magically matched. After that I bought an external fiery for my machine on ebay that matched what I already had and left behind all my color/quality issues going from machine to machine.

                There was a HUGE difference in output between the external vs embedded.

                External fiery every time.
                Quoted for truth.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by JustinB View Post

                  Sorry, going to have to disagree with you on this one.

                  I had 2 of the EXACT same presses, just one with embedded rip and one with external fiery rip. Send the exact same file to both machines and get completely different color. Just for fun I swapped the external fiery for the embedded and printed the job again. The colors between the two machines now magically matched. After that I bought an external fiery for my machine on ebay that matched what I already had and left behind all my color/quality issues going from machine to machine.

                  There was a HUGE difference in output between the external vs embedded.

                  External fiery every time.
                  No need to disagree, we are talking about different things. I am talking about quality, you are talking about color matching. OP is asking about "quality and crispness" of printing.

                  Unless I am mistaken, the OP is not going to purchase two different printers with different front ends to compare colors with... if there is indeed a *color* difference that's not something too concerning. One could also argue that the various KM/Canon/Xerox/etc machines they may be auditioning will also have color differences...even if they demo a floor model and purchase a different unit it will probably be a little different. I am assuming that the OP would demo said machine with their files to make sure it meets their expectations before purchasing. I also am assuming that the budget pretty much states that an external RIP is not going to happen.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Color is quality. The ability to faithfully reproduce the correct color is a sign of the quality of the machine. Embedded rips are flat out different than external rips. Their quality is absolutely different.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Joe View Post

                      I'm sorry but what is the appeal to having text that cannot be read without a loupe or magnifying glass? Attached is a PDF with text that at 12 pt fills an 8.5 x 11 page but at 1.5 pt is 14 lines that fills about 1" of the page.

                      [ATTACH]n276006[/ATTACH]
                      Here is one I printed on a Ricoh Pro C5200 with the external Fiery. I guess I haven't tried printing that small of font and haven't had anyone ask about it before. I may be easily impressed but I think it's amazing that something that small can print readable.

                      I doubt the Fiery makes any difference in the ability to print small text. What I have see with the Adobe print engine is more like things will not print correctly as in missing elements with APPE on vs off but not really that the quality is better. The places I see with the embedded type Fiery usually seem like they don't really need a Fiery at all. Like wonderings said you need to try printing your stuff on there, try both Fierys and see if the embedded one does what you want or if you think the better one is worth the price.

                      Attached Files
                      Warning I am a Ricoh tech.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by ksherrod View Post

                        No need to disagree, we are talking about different things. I am talking about quality, you are talking about color matching. OP is asking about "quality and crispness" of printing.

                        Unless I am mistaken, the OP is not going to purchase two different printers with different front ends to compare colors with... if there is indeed a *color* difference that's not something too concerning. One could also argue that the various KM/Canon/Xerox/etc machines they may be auditioning will also have color differences...even if they demo a floor model and purchase a different unit it will probably be a little different. I am assuming that the OP would demo said machine with their files to make sure it meets their expectations before purchasing. I also am assuming that the budget pretty much states that an external RIP is not going to happen.

                        All correct - though a sales rep made me aware of a very economical lease on a used C700 with an F200 Fiery. I will likely pass though. Do people lease used equipment?

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by msaeger View Post

                          Here is one I printed on a Ricoh Pro C5200 with the external Fiery. I guess I haven't tried printing that small of font and haven't had anyone ask about it before. I may be easily impressed but I think it's amazing that something that small can print readable.

                          I doubt the Fiery makes any difference in the ability to print small text. What I have see with the Adobe print engine is more like things will not print correctly as in missing elements with APPE on vs off but not really that the quality is better. The places I see with the embedded type Fiery usually seem like they don't really need a Fiery at all. Like wonderings said you need to try printing your stuff on there, try both Fierys and see if the embedded one does what you want or if you think the better one is worth the price.
                          Very cool. Ricoh presses are maybe the only major brand I haven't done any testing on yet. Maybe I should. Not sure off hand of shops in town with a C5200 though. I still have some confusion about the need for APPE. I got pretty darn good results on a Xerox Versant 80 with a bustled Fiery - which as I understand it doesn't even offer APPE. I've seem comparable, but certainly not better, results with an external Fiery on a Canon C700 and KM C2070, with APPE active.

                          But keep in mind, my documents are fairly plain except for the small font sizes. I'm looking for crisp text both against the white background and flowing through the one image in the design.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by JustinB View Post

                            Sorry, going to have to disagree with you on this one.

                            I had 2 of the EXACT same presses, just one with embedded rip and one with external fiery rip. Send the exact same file to both machines and get completely different color. Just for fun I swapped the external fiery for the embedded and printed the job again. The colors between the two machines now magically matched. After that I bought an external fiery for my machine on ebay that matched what I already had and left behind all my color/quality issues going from machine to machine.

                            There was a HUGE difference in output between the external vs embedded.

                            External fiery every time.
                            Thanks for sharing that experiment. I'm on board with an external Fiery, I just can't justify the cost for my first press and the potential that - though it would be awesome - I may not need it. Good to know that eBay can be a source of used Fiery servers.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by CliffSpielman View Post

                              Very cool. Ricoh presses are maybe the only major brand I haven't done any testing on yet. Maybe I should. Not sure off hand of shops in town with a C5200 though. I still have some confusion about the need for APPE. I got pretty darn good results on a Xerox Versant 80 with a bustled Fiery - which as I understand it doesn't even offer APPE. I've seem comparable, but certainly not better, results with an external Fiery on a Canon C700 and KM C2070, with APPE active.

                              But keep in mind, my documents are fairly plain except for the small font sizes. I'm looking for crisp text both against the white background and flowing through the one image in the design.
                              APPE is the Adobe PDF Print Engine and it will handle live transparency much better than the standard RIP included with a Fiery. Plan on it adding about $25,000 to the cost of the RIP though which is what we were recently quoted for adding APPE to ours.
                              Joe
                              OS: Mac OS X 10.10.2 - RIP: Prinergy Connect 6.1 - CTP: Luscher XPose! 160 (2)

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                APPE is a life saver. Highly recommend it.

                                Comment

                                4OverStandard FinishingDuploSmartsoft (Presswise)AleyantCanonKBA
                                CanonAleyantDuploStandard Finishing

                                What's Going On

                                Collapse

                                There are currently 4521 users online. 81 members and 4440 guests.

                                Most users ever online was 6,597 at 10:25 AM on 04-20-2018.

                                Working...
                                X