Re: Flight Check Pro vs. Pit Stop?
Let me add my two cents, clearly stating that I am from [Enfocus|
http://www.enfocus.com] so you know where I come from.
1) Like many of here said, the PitStop product line focuses on preflighting of PDF documents, FlightCheck can preflight about a billion of open document formats. Both are important to be honest as some errors can be detected better before a PDF was generated, some errors only appear as the result of PDF file conversion and have to be checked afterwards. So I would advise not to think of this as an either or, consider both tools as complementary.
2) And focused more on automation, both of the products can be automated quite well. Using [Enfocus Switch|
http://www.enfocus.com/product.php?id=4706] it is quite easy to setup an automated workflow that separates native document formats and PDF documents and uses the appropriate tool to automatically preflight both. As both Markzware and Enfocus cooperate in the [Crossroads|
http://crossroads.gradual.com] initiative (together with lots of other application vendors) it is also easy to find out how to set this up and make this work.
Using this kind of automation not only allows you to use preflight solutions from other vendors (such as DevZeroG or callas software) but also allows you to include file reception, creating PDF files, impositioning etc... in the automated process.
This might already be overkill for what you are trying to set up, but as you referenced "most automation" possible I thought I should point this out.
Hope this helps,
David.