Search results

Err, sorry, but i missed 1 character — it's fascicle sewing

That's funny, thanks. But I think I made it clear in the first post - that's what customer wrote in specification. Don't you think I made it up?

Aha, so this term is for hand sewing, right? And for machine sewing this can be same as smyth sewing maybe?

Thank you. maybe you have any image of the final sewing looks like?

We've got a specification for book and in postpress section we've found this term — fascicle sewing. Do anyone know what this is? I've ran through PIA books and didn't find any term like this.

definitely no You should try this link to learn all the info you might be need of. On the right you'll see lots of useful links along with attached to this post substrate correction calculator. Also you may be interested in some standards, 15339 series for sure

Substrate corrected printing is your answer. You should take fogra39 charset, recalculate it to new white point, create ICC profile from that new set, put this profile in your proofing software and print your proof. You will need real paper white lab value for that. if the press you're talking...

Don't get me wrong, but any article referring Ayn Rand should be put in trashcan in the first place. As for you i suggest you google the phrase "External locus of control". You can start from attached document, then move to the Wikipedia.

In Russia I see the print mindset is doing the same thing over and over hoping to get different result: "maybe this time it will work". Which is actually a schizophrenia symtom btw. Imagine that: whole industry in a permanent psychosis.

Alois, I know your post wasn't adressed to me. But. We're all in the same boat, right? As far as I remember, gordo and Erik Nikkanen suggested that the problem is "dot bridging". Personally i've heard about this print defect only regards to flexographic printing. But they made their point...

Alois, i've detected once again that you didn't answer the question. Instead you stating obvious statements and answering to I dunno who.

Any "chemically enriched F.S." or you're referring to any particular fs? And BTW, suppose i'm adding 9.5% will that count?

What? You're kidding, right?

Oh my, you want to raise an argue on that too :p

How can't we be? Sure

I wouldn't expect anything but that (:

Alois, i suggest you start posting pithy pdf's rather than your standart arrogant nonsense. Sincerely, cementary

Could you please refer to real medical research on health hazard due to the use of ipa in pressroom (link to pubmed for example) with reasonable statistical approach, control groups of all kinds etc. Meta publication would be just great. Otherwise please stop saying about my concerns for...

From my experience it is not an answer. In certain circumstances this will lead to extensive investments and for sure will bring more printing problems

Try to think from their point of view — they have production tools, whose vendor guarantee everything will work ok with distilled pdf's and do not guarantee anything with direct exported pdf's. It is written in the manuals for their workflows. So why would they want to overcome this? On the...