Search results

Sure? Can you show us microphoto of your highlight dots on plate after 1000 turns? ​​​

Name Spot's in your colorbar like Spot1, Spot2 etc

Third vote for prinegy. It's cost effective and easily scalable to any volume

Revolutions , well probably it is But on another hand — i see your problems arise near the edge of the plates. Taking into account that freshly exposed plates do not suffer from same problems, i would suggest to check the environmental condition around plate storage. Maybe it is too dry in your...

Revolutions , well, since you have a lot of experience, i would suggest some of mine: we use Sonora X since they were announced — we're also participate in trials before announcement. And we do follow kodak's instructions on minimum predamp. Our plates are all clean in +-25 sheets. And it...

I think that you're looking for "Correction of colorimetric data for variation in substrate colour", which is Annex A of ISO 15339-1 There is a calculating spreadsheet available on npes In the right corner of this webpage one can find "Computational Tools" block and download it for free

Milan, when kodak representatives sold you Sonora, did they have some white papers on best practicies with those plates?

What about turning pre-damp off or setting it to 1 revolution? Aftet all sonora plates developed with ink, not dampening

This is 100% true, but have to add that it affect any bitmap — doesn't matter if it is raster data or anything else (0,1) RIP knows how to alter 8-bitt data before converting to 1bit raster. I personally don't know any RIP that can alter 1bit data directly. But if one will use, say, descreen...

In october they shipped first S10 perfecting press. See their twitter for more info

Well, now i am ashamed (being twice younger) "Live and learn" :)

michaelejahn, SZmetana, guys, where did you find word "trapping" in TS post :rolleyes:? Anyway, one need to buy advanced trapping feature to use cutback. And michaele, what is your scenario for use of trapping on MY objects? All our offset presses are capable to perfectly register 2 plates in 4c...

Well, you should first chek in Acrobat with overprint preview, if Y truly knocks out M. In prinergy you should check your settings in colorconvert section of the refine process. Look for overprint conversion options. You can set all CMYK to knockout via first checkbox:

Thank you, Gordon I've made a call finally I just literally googled vancouvers office Unfortunately i'm still waiting for help :(

Thanks, tried that. They redirect to service but nobody answer

Do anyone have contacts from kodak vancouver? We need their help asap with araxidb phone, e-mail anything...

IMHO, Adobe color conversion engine works great. I think that maybe you do not fully understand how color management work. * You take one RGB image, convert it to ISO_coated_v2 profile — you get some CMYK values. * You take same RGB image, convert it to PSO_coated_v3 profile — you get some other...

I've read your post several times. And I still can't get it. What were you expecting? Similar images? How so? WP of 52 and 47 are not the same. Also why so many conversion steps? Why not just take eciRGB of Roman16 and convert to needed profile right in photoshop?

What about uv content in your lamps? do they (lamps) conform 3664 ISO? And also gordo 's question — M1 for both or M0 for 47, and M1 for 52?

thomas911 , for correct 47 proof one should use no-oba paper. For correct 52 proof - oba paper. So question number 1 is your paper correct? And question number 2 what are the viewing conditions?