Search results

Those Canon prismasync controllers are cool. Color control & consistency is better than Fiery. You gotta get used to it because it’s different.

First, yes…inkjet might be a solution if your volumes & applications warrant. But you must test your papers first. The best inkjet manufacturers should have hundreds of approved stocks. Excluding that expensive solution, there is still a step you can try that is recommended by paper mills...

If that’s the case, I wouldn’t touch it. You need experienced dedicated techs in the high speed digital production world. Especially in inkjet.

You know you can have a “service only” contract that doesn’t include supplies? It’s cheaper than a toner inclusive contract. At least that’s the case at Canon Solutions America. Just make certain you’re buying genuine manufacturer’s toner because some generics can really screw up your engine...

Gotta say the C800 is working quite well.

Shrinkage Shrinkage OK...I've got a stake in this: When printing on two sides, Canon imagePRESS calculates the shrinkage on each sheet and automatically compensates and calculates image size so that crop marks line up. In addition, imagePRESS is built from the ground up to register sheet...

Tulsadir: You might check with PIA. They did some test with respect to non-varnished post cards and tested scuffing from Postal machines. They tested offset and digital machines. One of digital machines performed better than offset. I can't remember which one, but I think they tried an...

Wrong--it's not close. I've seen both. C900 doesn't measure up to the Canon C7000. Details, midtones, shadows and highlights are all better on the Canon.

Good point Good point Dollars are important and obviously you can't get a Lexus for the price of a Kia. But you still have to sell what you print, you have to grow your business or pick up business you may be losing now to digital. Buyers of digital print also have expectations and most...

You have a dinosaur. The 3900+ has been extinct for years. Better as a museum piece.

Couple things for Jenny Couple things for Jenny Are you looking at the Canon C6000 or the C6000VP? The C6000VP maintains its rated speed regardless (60ppm). The C6000 will slow down slightly on some of the heavier stocks. Also, check out identical prints on gloss stocks. The 700 seams to...

Re: Canon Digital Press Amen to that Arizona.

Re: anyone know any tutorials for the canon imagepress c1 Question: What kind of imageRunner do you have? Canon basically makes 2 kinds of imageRunners: the iR and the iR-C. The iR is black only while the iR-C is color and black and white. The primary difference between the iR-C and...

Re: Canon ImagePRESS C1 - technical issues Funny thing about the Fiery and the Canon imagePRESS C1. EFI (Fiery) seems on the surface to have mixed up the X & Y coordinates on the Image Shift. On ours, it actually works different depending on whether it's letter or tabloid or up. You have to...

Re: Canon Imagepress 7000 & Kodak M700 Stay tuned...I have no idea, but the usual suspects would be drums, rollers, transfer blanket, etc.

Re: Canon Imagepress 7000 & Kodak M700 My bad, I apparently posted twice. Edited by: rogue on Mar 14, 2008 7:13 PM

Re: Canon Imagepress 7000 & Kodak M700 And as far the new Adobe PDF 1.6 File Format, yes that is available on all the new EFI/Canon RIPs.

Re: Canon Imagepress 7000 & Kodak M700 Canon is announcing it's customer replacable modules I believe next month -- it isn't entirely 'self-service'. Just a service designed to reduce downtime by allowing the customer to replace certain parts which would ordinarily be serviced by a technician...

Re: Canon Imagepress 7000 & Kodak M700 Oh. And one more thing. They are both manufactured by Canon.

Re: Canon Imagepress 7000 & Kodak M700 The C7000VP is a Canon engine all the way. Other than the usual industry sharing there is virtually no Kodak involvement. Canon spent several billion designing this engine from the ground floor. Kodak's M700 is a scaled down version of the C7000VP...