Can someone tell about ink consumption in offset printing by coated art paper and uncoated stock, if patch is printed?
e.g. how many square metres per kg.
Not even plus or minus 25%. Consider patch print.Unfortunately, there is no direct relationship with ink consumption and image area of the plate. It depends on what is being printed and errors can be quite large if one bases consumption on image coverage alone.
I doubt that the ink reduction caused by wet trapping is anything more than negligible in actual production presswork.Ink consumption. If one wet traps ink onto another layer of ink, one does not print as much ink as if one dry trapped the ink.
Some say that only about 70% of the ink is printed when wet trapping as compared to dry trapping or the amount of ink that is printed directly on the substrate.
By negligible I mean that typical production presswork the reduction in volume of ink usage caused by wet trapping is so little that it’s irrelevant.I am surprised you said this. What do you mean by negligible? As I stated earlier, it depends on what is being printed. If there is no overprinting, then it is not a factor. If there is a lot of overprinting, then it is a big factor.
you can get Area % free online with www.ink-cover.comCan someone tell about ink consumption in offset printing by coated art paper and uncoated stock, if patch is printed?
e.g. how many square metres per kg.
![]() The Video You Really Need To Watch Modern offset press performance comes with several nuances. Chris Travis, Director of Technology at Koenig & Bauer, shares some details. View The Video |