Search results

Seems pretty silly to me. I assume that the underlying reason is just to check a single plate. In which case, why not just turn off the others and see what's on the black one? Why flash?? If someone can explain to me what the underlying point of is, perhaps we can figure out something for a...

No but you CAN put them up in to the toolbar so that your favorite tools are right there in front of you! And with Acrobat XI, you can put them into sets, if you use them in common groups. Again, with Acrobat XI, you can create your own groups of tools. I hope you aren't working with PDF/X...

It is targeted at professionals - Print Professionals, Legal Professionals, Government Professionals, Engineering Professionals, Education Professionals, Geospatial Professionals, and dozens and dozens of other professionals for whom we have added features to the product over its 20 year history!

FWIW: This has been the position of Adobe concerning Acrobat since version 2.0 (aka the first time you could have two different versions :) - almost 20(!) years ago! NOTHING has changed here.

1 - Anyone doing so would be breaking the law by doing so. 2 - If you really have the number, why not call Adobe Technical Support?

Acrobat XI is an excellent product for use by print professionals. We added a number of new features and improvements specifically for this segment. But your not our primary target.

But do they use the same font? I suspect the answer is yes, but can you confirm? Also, do you know how these pages are created? What tool/program and with what PDF creation settings? Excellent - that's quite helpful! My ASSUMPTION (since I can't see the specific files, but have seen this...

Adobe only supports a single version of Acrobat installed on a computer (Mac or Windows) at any one time. If you choose to install multiple versions on your system, you do so AT YOUR OWN RISK and w/o any help or support from us.

There are a LOT of misconceptions or outright errors in this, so let's work through those first... PDF doesn't support variable text. Do you mean something such as editable/fillable form fields? There is NO POSTSCRIPT in a PDF file. So whatever you think is the increase has nothing to do...

About time, since we aren't supporting that version any longer. Given that there are millions more secretaries using Acrobat than print professionals - that is EXACTLY what we did! That is correct. We only support one version of Acrobat installed at any time. (along with one version of...

It is the PORTABLE Document Format. Note the first word - PORTABLE. Screen angles are anything BUT portable. As such, they don't belong in PDF - which is why they aren't there after 20 years. (and never will be). As Michael said - if you want angles with PDF - that's what JDF (was supposed...

Assuming you are on the Mac, these seems like known issues that have either already been addressed in the current update (11.0.3) or will be handled in a forthcoming update.

It may seem logical, but it is not in keeping with the standard. Our goal has always been to be the most standards-compliant product out there, when it comes to PDF. Agreed. It's an old term from the days before we even bothered handling PDF/X in Acrobat. We'll give that some thought about...

Happy to help with Acrobat XI. [FYI: There is no such thing as Acrobat CC] No software is perfect, but not sure what you are referring to specfically. Acrobat X is not following the PDF/X standard, while Acrobat XI is. The standard clearly states that the OutputIntent of the PDF/X file is...

How about with Acrobat? You can do this using an Action.

OK - let's assume that. Since PDF/VT-1 is derived from PDF/X-4, probably not a huge step...assuming they already do PDF/X-4. Why? Are you sure that is the correct thing to do? In many cases, the PDF/VT file will contain parts that go to different devices - in which case, the operation you...

Not a PDF limitation, but may be an issue with InDesign CS 5.5... Not at all! We've seem much larger than that...

It will open _YOUR_ existing files. It won't help you with any future files that SOMEONE ELSE creates with current/future versions.

It's still very early and we don't really have a specific time frame/plan for when/how often we will release archival versions. Whenever we do, you can "squirrel them away" as you see fit.

No. Just as CS5 can't (necessarily) open CS6 files - the "archival copy" won't open the latest versions. However, the latest versions will be able to "save to archival", if necessary.