Search results

There is nothing wrong with your pdf. But i've got a question — why did your printer choose line halftone pattern instead of e.g. circle dot?

Nope. We're not happy. I just need to say it loud - HUBER SUCKS!

My 5 cents — if you have 2 or more CTPs with process plates and you want the output to be exactly the same then you should go 2 curves way. If you have one CTP i would suggest 1 curve way if you take good care of your plate processor. In our printshop for example we have 2 magnus vlf with...

For standard layout odd pages will always have spine on the left, even on the right. When you set your bleed values at the front they automatically applies to the back

That's not true. You can manually set any bleed for page in preps 5.3 and any preps. And preps do not use bleed box - only trimbox.

Do anyone have experience with their fountain solution? Especially gold s-500 and sess.

Thanks, Gordo! That's what we've decided to do. Btw i've found that one printshop in europe describe their multiplex sa with "1000 facicles per hour", though neither our multiplex manual nor meccanotecnica catalog use this term

Err, sorry, but i missed 1 character — it's fascicle sewing

That's funny, thanks. But I think I made it clear in the first post - that's what customer wrote in specification. Don't you think I made it up?

Aha, so this term is for hand sewing, right? And for machine sewing this can be same as smyth sewing maybe?

Thank you. maybe you have any image of the final sewing looks like?

We've got a specification for book and in postpress section we've found this term — fascicle sewing. Do anyone know what this is? I've ran through PIA books and didn't find any term like this.

definitely no You should try this link to learn all the info you might be need of. On the right you'll see lots of useful links along with attached to this post substrate correction calculator. Also you may be interested in some standards, 15339 series for sure

Substrate corrected printing is your answer. You should take fogra39 charset, recalculate it to new white point, create ICC profile from that new set, put this profile in your proofing software and print your proof. You will need real paper white lab value for that. if the press you're talking...

Don't get me wrong, but any article referring Ayn Rand should be put in trashcan in the first place. As for you i suggest you google the phrase "External locus of control". You can start from attached document, then move to the Wikipedia.

In Russia I see the print mindset is doing the same thing over and over hoping to get different result: "maybe this time it will work". Which is actually a schizophrenia symtom btw. Imagine that: whole industry in a permanent psychosis.

Alois, I know your post wasn't adressed to me. But. We're all in the same boat, right? As far as I remember, gordo and Erik Nikkanen suggested that the problem is "dot bridging". Personally i've heard about this print defect only regards to flexographic printing. But they made their point...

Alois, i've detected once again that you didn't answer the question. Instead you stating obvious statements and answering to I dunno who.

Any "chemically enriched F.S." or you're referring to any particular fs? And BTW, suppose i'm adding 9.5% will that count?

What? You're kidding, right?