Search results

In a pinch we have used an Epson Workforce Inkjet to knock out a small envelope run here and there. I don't think I would ever really recommend an inkjet we just happen to have it around for scanning and got desperate enough to try it. Do you not have any production or office laser printers? I...

As far as I know that HP cannot print on anything rigid. The max gsm is 200gsm unless I am misunderstanding something. file://server2022/d/Allfiles/1%20Temps/522831-Datasheet-EN.PDF

If you don't mind and you are able, can you tell me what this sold for?

I echo what some others have said. You need to step up to a machine that is more in the realm of light production or production that has curl control. With my Canon C700 I never really even have to worry about curl. The only time I notice it is when I have told the machine the wrong paper I am...

If this is a serious question. What is your application, your expected volume, and your budget?

They run fine on my C710 thus far.

I haven't had issues with Canva files yet. I tell them to use these settings. (see image)

Anyone have any idea what kind of price range these run? https://www.pfsgraphics.com/printing/digital-printers/pmokirp530-rp530-label-printer-powered-by-oki

@mongoose Just wondering what shut you down on the Canon? I run a C700 a bit older model and I am impressed with the wide gamut of run-ability on the things you mentioned minus the 16Pt and above stock. Envelopes (with kit)(not the small ones), carbonless, coated/uncoated, synthetics and what...

@Alois Senefelder I haven't seen or heard of such a setup but I would be thinking the finishing would all be inline and straight to palletizing like a big web press. Maybe that doesn't exist but that was my thought.

Here are some new images I took. I am voting for some kind of high volume roll to roll inkjet. I'd imagine such a machine would have stationary heads but some of the lines I am seeing that look like sweep lines are things that I have only seen in inkjet. Something like a memjet type of...

@bill kahny Do you know if that would be true of the C700 as well? Do you know the behind the scenes settings that change the gloss level? On my C700 there is gloss optimization and all that. There is a more glossy finish when I use a coated setting vs uncoated as far as paper profile goes but...

@gordo I'll have to do that tomorrow but it is certainly stochastic and not a normal line screen, that's what caught my eye to start. I'm 37, I can still see it without a loop ;-)

I meant model to model overall not really gloss to gloss. Does it compare more to a Canon 10000 vs the Canon C810?

@Magnus59 That's a new one for me :-) I had to look it up. Looks possible. I am going to refer to it as "roto" to sound like I know something next time it comes up ;-)

Thanks for that info. Do you know the comparable models in the world of Xerox, Canon, or Konica? I am not too familiar with production Ricoh machines.

No problem, thanks for the clarification. So you are saying out of the gate this machine shines (pun intended) at having the most offset like look in your experience? You actually need to engage the gloss setting is you want it to match coated finishes?

Did you mean 10 variations of the machine or the C7200 series has 10 variations of finishes when printing?

@Alois Senefelder, that is one of the reasons I'd be so surprised, one the quality that looks offset and two for it to be affordable. About 94 pages cover is slightly heavier than the guts but it's probably lighter than 65lb. cover. Distibution is probably every Amazon Prime member in the U.S...

Who has the best game in town for a mid-range production copier that can look most like offset on uncoated stock? I love the finish of the Indigo of course but the price and cost of operation is out of my league. Are there any dry toners out there with relative success?