Search results

Yes. Marketplace.

My admin console shows only me, doesn't give me the ability to assign users and their apps, and I lost a single Acrobat license that they are supposedly working on. It's been weeks.

If you mean inserts, The Challenge Printing Company in Clifton NJ does that.

It's within the print driver. Advanced options/Advanced media control

I moved to an Epson SureColor using Mitsubishi Clear Proof 180 100" roll with 3" core, and I've been happy with the accuracy. The trick was in the feed adjustment. We are outputting dielines and not concerned about a DMax and our maximum sheet size is 28.5"x 40", so YMMV.

I use the blue box as well.

Here is a reseller of EagleRIP which is basically the same product. I've known these guys for 30 years. Maybe they can assist. www.ezhitech.com

I would absolutely go with Xitron Navigator with the CIP3 plug in or it's equivalent through another Harlequin based RIP producer. I think it's the simplest, most cost effective, yet perfectly capable system. Anything is tough on a budget these days. Sales has changed big time. Esko for...

You can chose whatever bounding box you like, but when you send a PDF to that RIP, it is going to process at the size defined at the RIP. CropBox is fine as long as it is defined in your document and it is the chosen bounding box at the RIP.

You'll find this in the Page Setup Manager...bottom left of the dialog box. Make this match what you set in Acrobat and you should be good to go. If you define the Crop Box (for example) and have the RIP set to honor the Crop Box, the page size shouldn't matter.

Print Production>Set Page Boxes

You have to define your page size bounding box (CropBox, TrimBox, etc...) in the PDF options at the RIP and be sure to define that area for the PDF being sent. It's likely honoring the default setting which isn't working for your particular files.

I'm an old Scitex guy back to the days of Imagers and Erays, way before Brisque, and we always ran the 7.5º shift.

This is who I use. I realize it's a zombie thread but this info could be helpful to someone.

We use Oris, but I find the interface clunky and not intuitive at all. It needs an overhaul IMO.

We use the Fuji XP-L and haven't had an issue here in NJ. Probably just jinxed myself.

You find this to be significantly different than handling a round dot?

Lol. I guess so. I can't imagine there's much of that left. I still can't see how that would be advantageous. Maybe to keep the shadows slightly more open. I can't imagine it would be that significant.

Gordo, Can you think of a scenario when a euclidean dot would be desired?

Agreed.