We have trialed numerous bio blanket/ roller washes, and have given up because the shinohara auto wash is pathetic,, it was not a fault of the product itself as it works fine manualy,
So we are onto a Non photochemically reactive wash, and have been told that its low to no VOC beacause its non photochemically reactive, (it still has 900g/l liquid hydrocarbons)
I'm not going to disclose the compant name , but I can say that I was looking on varns website at their california wash which is also non photochemically reactive, but it lists a content of VOC g/L 788.. now if that has such a high VOC content, How can another company using petrolium products manage a low VOC rating?
When I asked said "comapany" about their wash befor we trialed , did it offer the same health and environmental benefits as a vegetable based wash, with below 100g/l VOC their answer was yes, as its 67 celcius flash and non photochemically reactive so it doesn't form VOC's..
Can anyone in the know please tell me if I've just been feed a whole load of hogwash..
Thanks,,,
So we are onto a Non photochemically reactive wash, and have been told that its low to no VOC beacause its non photochemically reactive, (it still has 900g/l liquid hydrocarbons)
I'm not going to disclose the compant name , but I can say that I was looking on varns website at their california wash which is also non photochemically reactive, but it lists a content of VOC g/L 788.. now if that has such a high VOC content, How can another company using petrolium products manage a low VOC rating?
When I asked said "comapany" about their wash befor we trialed , did it offer the same health and environmental benefits as a vegetable based wash, with below 100g/l VOC their answer was yes, as its 67 celcius flash and non photochemically reactive so it doesn't form VOC's..
Can anyone in the know please tell me if I've just been feed a whole load of hogwash..
Thanks,,,