Search results

Woe, did that tech arrive with his software on Syquest disks? I can't think of any reason why anybody would want to use Postscript, not even Michael J Fox!! PDF is definitely the way to go, you would be so slow and uncompetitive if you went with Postscript, and so many PDF features are not...

I think the takeaway for you here is that that Page Scaling flag is probably applied by the originating design application when you exported the PDF. I think Adobe Illustrator does that by default? (I stand to be corrected). The approach would be to design within the 200x200 inch limit, and then...

Yep, you have a Page Scaling factor of 10 in this PDF, that's where the issue comes from.

How big was the original PDF? The PDF specification has a size limit of 200 x 200 inches, but there is a technique called 'user units' or page scaling to make the document larger. What application generated the original PDF?

Linkedin had pretty good coverage, depending on who your contacts were. Almost real time. Was a really great show for us and most people I spoke to. Inkish and whattheythink did a great job, so i'm not sure the 'dinosaur; thing is correct, I think the website is probably the wrong media to look...

Desktop/Plugin or Server versions?

Why don’t you ask them? Quite Software is still in business

I think if the OP wants separations, and wants to go the Postscript route you can still print to separations if you select postscript output (very last century, but if needs must). Then distill that to a PDF, each separation would be a separate page in the PDF, and just delete the ones you don't...

So to clarify. You're deselecting layers, and then printing that to a new PDF file? Why don't you just deselect the layers and then do a 'Save as" and make a new PDF without the hassle of printing? You would get a file that would work I think (dependent on your next processes). I've not tried...

In addition I forgot to mention, this profile generates a PDF/X-4 file. If you want to retain that you should probably add the 'Photoshop 5 Default CMYK' Profile as the Output Intent.

You won't be able to use the Microsoft ICM, that's not available. You'll have to use the Little CMS CMM I would suggest you look at the 'Just make my Office PDF work! - CMYK ISO Coated v2' Preflight profile. Copy it and change the destination profile in the Color Management settings so your...

For the record, development of the PDF format for over a decade (since 2008) has been driven by ISO and not Adobe. https://www.cnet.com/tech/services-and-software/adobes-pdf-becomes-iso-standard/

If you want to test your rip properly and see what PDF features are working and which need better configuration, download and rip this test suite. Then you will know where your problems are. http://gwg.org/gos5/

I'm pretty sure the KM1 has a reasonably current rip that should handle transparency in-rip. Why do you think it can't handle transparency?

Just edit your PDF so that the Media Box (and other boxes) are the same size as the Crop Box. I'm assuming you have Acrobat Pro already as a minimum if you are working with PDF.

You should probably post that question on Enfocus Community - Community index That's the best place for Switch feedback.

What does your look like? Are you selecting pages like @prepressdork suggested?

You don't actually need it here as you are pasting forward. Split Action list is when you need to past backwards, ie last page to first page.

Yes, 'but we've always done it that way'! :) For some reason people think the CMYK builds are some kind of bible, and complain when the Lab > CMYK conversions give different numbers.

Agreed, you just have to have the correct Patone naming convention. We covered that in the GWG webinar we did on the options available. Might be of interest to some people. https://gwg.org/learn-more/webinars/watch-gwg-webinars/