We always lease now, bought a Konica and fell foul of supplier deciding it was costing them too much to supply service and consumables and terminated our contract, Konica would then only take it on directly if we paid another 5k to get the machine brought back to 'their' standard. Also we had no power to withhold payment when things went totally wrong
I'm very new to the digital world, as in just signed for my first machine yesterday, but I think there's situations where you should do both. We outright bought the machine, and can tell you we saved A LOT of money. Plus now, our ROI is under 2 years if we just print what my company has printed, and do not get another single job. Plus, at the end of our service contract, even if the technology is out of date for us, the machine has paid for itself plus provided profit and we have an asset worth at least 5-10k at minimum. But I'm in a different situation where the machine doesn't need to make money for our business to survive.
So for our business, buying was a no brainer. No risk, no monthly payments, and saved tons of money on the machine. But, we had the capital to buy. A lot of places don't.
And as for leading anything that depreciates, I will never lease a car. But I'm weird, I drive them until the wheels fall off lol.
Why didnt you use the capital to market your business to create more business and lease the machine (or employ a salesman etc. or use the capital to improve your workflows to lower TCO or such?)?
A 30-day Fix for Managed Chaos
As any print professional knows, printing can be managed chaos. Software that solves multiple problems and provides measurable and monetizable value has a direct impact on the bottom-line. “We reduced order entry costs by about 40%.” Significant savings in a shop that turns about 500 jobs a month. Learn how……. |