Entering the CTP Market

Re: Entering the CTP Market

I stand corrected. I had no idea.
So, does it just plug right in with a PIF or whatever they call the card?
 
Re: Entering the CTP Market

@ kaiserwilhelm

you wrote;

"I just simply like things to be the same on my screen as they are on the pdf as they are on the plate. Simple request, correct?"

jahn comments - things cannot be the same in your PDF and your ripped file, for one (and if you could somehow 'view' you plate in a PDF, well, thats just plain dumb, but if you could, well they would be different)

Dot gain compensation might be one reason. Even if you make a PDF, then process the PDF into a device dependent PDF, they are different. If you someohow make a PDF (or view screened 1 bit files) on screen, they are different. So, I am not sure you would want to somehow be 'fooled' into thinking they are somehow the same but some application. When I worked in Gravure prepress, we had no 'dot proof' - we engraved digitally direct to cylinder back in the the 80s using a helio. we depended in inkjet proofs. That is all we saw before running on press. These press runs sometimes reached 50 million. Weekly. These were retail newspapaer inserts from retailers who sold clothes, just so you understand this was not some schlocky printing.

Perhaps this is why I am so confused by all this interest in people examining intermediate files on screen - I am a fan of process control, tighting and testing and hard wireing your workflow, automating things and trusting it. Any tweak and color tuning is done FAR before the plate making process, and if you have your act together, you should be dragging PDF files into some folder and out pops the plates (or pages from some color digital proofing of printing device)

I have no idea what a '1 bit catcher' is. Any RIP has to write a file that is passed to a hardrive trough some bus & wires to the marking engine, so, from that perspective, all systems have bit generation and store and forward systems. Even a Xerox copier has a 'bit cartcher'

Perhaps you are speaking of a popular product with many Agfa customers - AGFA Print Drive Many other happy AGFA customers simply connect the RIP to the platesetter - if you have your workflow together, this works fine - years before platesetter, many were successfully making imposed film without Print Drive - did they world suddenly lose its mind and suddenly need to view these files, or did was it that we all decided we did not trust the guys upstream in prepress and finally had a way to see the file that was going to make our plates?

Or was it simply some great markerting ? <wink>

. If I were making sets of several plates for the same job (for a very long run, or if I were running the same job and multiple presses) I could see why I might want to rip then store 1 bit TIFF files, but me, I can tell you that I would prefer to NOT store such data, and would use AGFA Salient to simply re-rip the files and make new plates - for many users, they have no time for all this triple checking and simply make plates and trust they system they have set up.

If I recall, AGFA Print Drive offered a tool named "Quick Fix" - not sure if this is still available or if it were ever popular - but they idea is that you could select a small section of an application file or PDF, and using a Plug-in - just send this single very small section to the rip for very fast re-processing and then send this relatively tint set of bitmaps to 'burn' over the existing plates - this was a very impressive demo moment, and showed an advantage over re-ripping and entire 16 up imposed flat/form.

But in these days of very fast networks, SAN, NAS and 16 Gigs on board RAM on a networked RIP server, it would be fast enough to simply re-rip the flat.

As any system is due to fail, hot-swop drives and redundancy in your prepress workflow system is the only real protection, so I fail to see why a "3,000 Dell Box" is somehow the cause of your mistrust or makes you lose sleep somehow. 10% of all file processed incorrectly and take 80% of your time to discover why and correct it. I maintain that 94% of the files that do not process correctly are caused because they were not prepared correctly and were submitted into a production stream without preflight.

Setting up pre-production workflow is far more complex than making a PDF workflow decision or which platesetter or plate to bet the companys production on.
 
Re: Entering the CTP Market

We rerun carton jobs over and over (because the client does not want to pay for a whole wack of 24pt cardboard at once and we don't want to have to store hundreds of skids - it's just not like commercial paper, right?). We use a ROOM although rudimentary workflow because 95% of the jobs come in wrong and have to be torn down and rebuilt, this for various and numerous reasons). But the one bit tifs we create we must and do keep for copious exact reprints. Using Output Director (padding and clipping feature needed, but not full Rampage) allows for revised same name tifs by auto numbering them 00, 01, 02 ... at the end of their names. This makes life easy. And we want to keep all the versions since they may just be a french type change on the black to create version ABC_01 for example. Or there might be a spot colour change or there might be a foil stamp on 02 but not on 00, etc. Any number of reasons.
I don't see the problem you are complaining about being anything more than simple good housekeeping at the workstation.

BTW, we are now using an 8TB Raid so all the shops plate files are basically on-line all the time. It's super fast, gigantic in storage (but not physically very large) and has hot swappables for protection. Our archive system and redundancy is further upstream (since most changes require new ripping). We use triple redundancy, a left-over requirement from credit card and stamp printing.
Cheers,
John W
 
Re: Entering the CTP Market

NAP001,

These posts are all very thorugh however the fact that you only run 150 plates per month does not warrant the money spent on these systems in question. I would stick with something at a lower cost range. 30-40k dependng on the size of your plate. Get some samples from a few manufacturers, compare quality and price. Your workflow would not warrant 150k+ on a platesetter, it would take you 10 years to recoupe your investment. Have you considered the Inkjet market? While the output from these new inkjet machines are rivaling the laser systems the cost is 1/3 of what you would pay. Do a search for "inkjet CTP" you can get a few companies popping up. I would start there with your plate volume.

hope this helps...
 
Re: Entering the CTP Market

Hi Napp,

I would suggest Heidelberg system with Meta dimension and meta shooter. Its a great system and wont let you down.

PRINT
 

PressWise

A 30-day Fix for Managed Chaos

As any print professional knows, printing can be managed chaos. Software that solves multiple problems and provides measurable and monetizable value has a direct impact on the bottom-line.

“We reduced order entry costs by about 40%.” Significant savings in a shop that turns about 500 jobs a month.


Learn how…….

   
Back
Top