Hello
I currently work for a packaging printer where 95% of our work (250 orders a week) is printed using spot colours.
There has been a number of discussions about printing using high fidelity system such as Hexachrome (all presses in plant are 6 colour) to reduce washups.
Does anybody have any experience or advice on this?
Is Hexachrome the best option or does another method give better results?
Other methods give better results.
Hexachrome is not designed to simulate spot colors with screen tint builds. Instead it is a proprietary system that combines a swatchbook of flat tint screen tint builds which is used to specify colors and a proprietary ink hue set that uses fluorescing agents in the C, M, Y, O, and G inks. So, PANTONE Hexachrome is a unique six-color inkset, and NOT a CMYK ++ system.
If you use "Big H" Hexachrome the integrity your CMYK images are effected by the special CMY inks. The fluorescing agents can make the inks problematic on press and unsuitable for packaging containing food items.
Big H Hex seems not to be supported by Pantone anymore since their web pages have been "under constuction" for over two years.
Most shops will use small H Hex. I.e. conventional C, M, Y, K inks with conventional O, and Green, or Orange and Violet, or Warm Red and Blue extended process colors. They then create their own swatchbooks from which creatives can select their colors. See here:
Quality In Print: The Color Atlas - helping designers to specify color
sixth one down for a sample of what one would look like.
Opaltone is another system that is functionally similar to Hex but uses a 7 color set of non-flourescing inks.
Both Esko and Kodak have solutions that allow you to use the inkset of your choice, and I believe the number of extended process colors of your choice to build screen tint combinations to replace standard spot colors (like Pantone) as well as unique brand colors. They base their recipes on an ICC profile and/or a look up recipe based on your print condition (inks, substrate, screening, etc.) hence they are more accurate an flexible.
best, gordon p