kaiserwilhelm
Well-known member
We have a facility 1,000 miles from us. Their RIP is old and they will be replacing soon.
We have Screen Trueflow and have had it for 10 years.
250,000 plates and probably 60,000 rips - of which 90 percent have been APPE since we received that
RIP in 2007 or so.
It is a workhorse, but no bells and whistles.
We really want to end up with synergy. Same RIP between both facilities.
Can anyone give me any arguments of one vs the other? Sorry, but Kodak, etc are out.
At this point, this truly is a Esko v Screen decision. I buy what they are buying, or they buy what I am buying.
I am sure that both produce an appe pdf that will in turn produce a one bit tiff.
The main point is that they are being sold on the automation. I own PowerSwitch and have found it useful, but
not enough to drive my decision on a RIP. To me, automation out of the box is as useful as automatic wipers that
come on in the rain. The concept is neat, but in the end, does it get me to my destination faster?
We have Screen Trueflow and have had it for 10 years.
250,000 plates and probably 60,000 rips - of which 90 percent have been APPE since we received that
RIP in 2007 or so.
It is a workhorse, but no bells and whistles.
We really want to end up with synergy. Same RIP between both facilities.
Can anyone give me any arguments of one vs the other? Sorry, but Kodak, etc are out.
At this point, this truly is a Esko v Screen decision. I buy what they are buying, or they buy what I am buying.
I am sure that both produce an appe pdf that will in turn produce a one bit tiff.
The main point is that they are being sold on the automation. I own PowerSwitch and have found it useful, but
not enough to drive my decision on a RIP. To me, automation out of the box is as useful as automatic wipers that
come on in the rain. The concept is neat, but in the end, does it get me to my destination faster?