Recent content by kdonegan

Thanks. Bindery Parts had some in stock.

Hi Craig any chance you still have leftover rings in decent shape? Thanks Kevin

We recently found out that Ultimate score is no longer in business. We were sold a Baum 2020 with 2 Ultimate Scoring units about 16 months ago and now need to replace some of the scoring rings. Can anyone point me toward a source for this consumable item? Thanks Kevin

post insert post insert Craig, how do you insert the cover? i was told that the post inserter is not compatible with the 506 when I tried to spec it on a C8000? thanks

I don't think they have started shipping yet. My Xerox rep only received pricing last week. Have not seen one yet but based on what I have read it appears to have a very low duty cycle?

The Xerox 800 is very nice but more than 2x the cost of the other solutions we are looking at. the 901,C8000 and Canon 7010 are all in the same ballpark. Glad to hear they are replacing your device. Good Luck. Years ago, we had Xerox replace an engine. think it was just a lemon.

Hi Happy What is your monthly volume? what is your most common type of work being produced? what did you have prior to the 901? Thanks Kevin

not sure who you are so must be a different Kevin. When you bought the 7010 did you look at others? curious what was the deciding factor at the time? thanks and good luck, hope your issues are resolved

Hello All Looking for user feedback from users of these print engines. We are replacing our aging 6500's and I have been evaluating these models: At first look, I thought the KM C8000 showed best quality but it was slowest. 12x18 100# cover duplexed i found: KM C8000 = 13ppm Canon 7010VP = 16ppm...

Hi Jay What devices were you running prior to buying the 8000? We run several KM6500's so the 8000 would be our primary device. (100k clicks per month) I like the test prints I have seen so far although wish the finish were a little less glossy. Do you do any wafer seal/tabbing? any trouble with...

I'm currently researching the C8000, Ricoh 901s. Also planning to look at Canon 7010 Ran some tests using 12x18 cover and the Ricoh was quite a bit faster. Duplex pages C8000 = 13ppm Ricoh 901 = 20ppm That was my first round of testing, have not performed quality tests yet.

No did not include rip, the speed was measured several times during a 2 hour print run. My understanding of the 8000 is that it runs at 80ppm up to 150gsm or so, then drops to 70ppm. Drops speed again over 300 gsm. That is why I am looking for and testing real world measurements. The published...

looking for a true throughput speed for 8080. Published speed is not always accurate as it does not include in-run adjustments, etc. I am using 12x18 100# cover duplexed for my testing. For example: I tested KM8000 the other day and it produced 750 duplexed sheets per hour (12.5 per minute)...

Anthony at QMDI Printing Press - Contact QMDI For Parts and Services

Hi Steve Where are you located? how long have you had the C901. I am currently looking at the 901 as compared to the KM8000. We run heavy coverage, mostly cover weights 12x18 and 13x19. looking to avg 100k impressions per month Thanks for any opinions