One of my printing clients asked me to print a test form on a used, rebuild press he was buying. The rebuild shop did a good job of setting up to run the test. We had pretty good, representative sheets, IMHO.
Everything looked pretty good until we measured 50 consecutive sheets. We had fairly big density and gain variations sheet-to-sheet....in cycles of three. I'm guessing that this has something to do with the triple impression cylinder design of this 'non-bearer' press. My question would be: is this behavior inherent in the design? (all the units displayed the same tendency) Or is something worn out? Would softer, compressible top and underblankets help?
Not my area of expertise...any help would be sincerely appreciated.
Everything looked pretty good until we measured 50 consecutive sheets. We had fairly big density and gain variations sheet-to-sheet....in cycles of three. I'm guessing that this has something to do with the triple impression cylinder design of this 'non-bearer' press. My question would be: is this behavior inherent in the design? (all the units displayed the same tendency) Or is something worn out? Would softer, compressible top and underblankets help?
Not my area of expertise...any help would be sincerely appreciated.