I am no pro at this, But i am now getting decent results. I have my own print shop, so learning all this myself is a huge bonus to me and the business.
Lots of good stuff here, but i am continually running into the same problem regardless of wether using Onyx, Caldera or what I am currently using Aurelon (GMG) Print factory. When creating a profile You start with a linearization, read with a spectrophotometer, set ink restrictions and visually\physically evaluate, print a gamut chart and read with a spectrophotometer again.
I am at a loss as to why there is no (for lack of a better word) scientific method for determining ink restrictions other than a visual physical evaluation. Should there not be Density/Chroma reference for setting this? with the added physical/visual evaluation? Any body have any thoughts?
With about 45 years of experience and experience with wide and grand format work since it began most of this talk is a waste of time. We use many media, we use basically 4 on a regular basis, each media requires a specific profile for each print speed and output resolution. Each profile costs us hundreds of dollars in lost production and materials to create it and is rendered next to useless when the media manufacturer modifies the product without notice, usually within a few months.
We try a media and print a test pattern checking grey balance under 5,000 kelvin, if we can't get a manufacturers profile with a good grey balance then we create one but other wise no. The colors of ink jet printed media varies so much under different real word real use lighting conditions satisfying the client is about grey balance under controlled conditions and modifying color after communication with the client in their viewing environment.
We have a shop to run and payroll to make.
pauly92 your glass substrate is very stable when compared to vinyl which can and does change from roll to roll let alone lot to lot. Our artistic media is better as far as stability goes and we have a great grey balance profile for that. We do a few archival prints a few thousand a year. As far as printing on glass what device are you using? I'm assuming a flatbed UV is that correct?
>some things need to be dead on and for us, the key is a perfect profile.
Just exactly what is that? Isn't converting an Adobe 1998 RGB or Prophoto RGB to a print device profile a matter of taste? There certainly is no one correct way.
With about 45 years of experience and experience with wide and grand format work since it began most of this talk is a waste of time. We use many media, we use basically 4 on a regular basis, each media requires a specific profile for each print speed and output resolution. Each profile costs us hundreds of dollars in lost production and materials to create it and is rendered next to useless when the media manufacturer modifies the product without notice, usually within a few months.
We try a media and print a test pattern checking grey balance under 5,000 kelvin, if we can't get a manufacturers profile with a good grey balance then we create one but other wise no. The colors of ink jet printed media varies so much under different real word real use lighting conditions satisfying the client is about grey balance under controlled conditions and modifying color after communication with the client in their viewing environment.
We have a shop to run and payroll to make.
pualy92 I do quite a few donor walls we use starfire (iron free glass) all the time if you'd like an opportunity to look at a future project that may come up email me at davidmilisockgraphictechnology.com all this work is architectural in nature and many times takes a year or more in the design process.
A 30-day Fix for Managed Chaos
As any print professional knows, printing can be managed chaos. Software that solves multiple problems and provides measurable and monetizable value has a direct impact on the bottom-line. “We reduced order entry costs by about 40%.” Significant savings in a shop that turns about 500 jobs a month. Learn how……. |