I had a demo on my PC of KM's AccurioPro Flux software a couple of years ago.
It wasn't connected to a controller but it seemed to process a large file quite quickly - by process I mean compiling hundreds of pages from different docs, inserting tabs etc..
So in that sense I think you can probably do a lot of what you can with a fiery using KM's workflow software instead. Don't know about the limitations of each controller though, but If you're doing everything through drivers sounds like there's lots of room for improvement.
You mention an embedded fiery. I have several of those which are about 7 years old and they are slow as shit. Think they have celeron professors even. A recent external fiery controller will be much faster.
It wasn't connected to a controller but it seemed to process a large file quite quickly - by process I mean compiling hundreds of pages from different docs, inserting tabs etc..
So in that sense I think you can probably do a lot of what you can with a fiery using KM's workflow software instead. Don't know about the limitations of each controller though, but If you're doing everything through drivers sounds like there's lots of room for improvement.
You mention an embedded fiery. I have several of those which are about 7 years old and they are slow as shit. Think they have celeron professors even. A recent external fiery controller will be much faster.