I have a rather lengthy post on this site about our initial teething problems with the 9110. Since the middle of july it's been a lot better but...
Its certainly better than the 901 99% of the time, my major gripes are large areas of solid black which look a bit litho like, not like the dense solid you get off the 901 which Ricoh Japan are looking in to and the very poor paper library which is down to Ricoh UK rushing the machine out, I m having to perform a lot of messing at when I should be productive, having to create new papers, having to adjust paper magnification to allow for shrinkage, fuser temp and nip pressure for creasing, adjusting fuser speed to get rid of exit scratches, these are on a regular basis, less often I have had to tinker with image transfer bias, paper transfer bias, etc. It's nice to get to know this stuff as the knowledge does make my life easier but my boss thinks I should be getting on with the work.?????
Far fewer paper jams, the new paper draws are a lot better the machine itself is better built and seem sturdier than the 901
Banner length on our machine is set at 700mm as we are using the converted paper tray 3 not the special unit that goes between the Imaging unit and the LCT.
Also its fast, 2000 sheets of D/S 400gsm Conqueror in just over an hour. Backing up is better than the 901 and more consistent and on the maintenance side I have only had to open her up once to sort out a couple of white lines in the black, she is now at 1.347 Million clicks.
And a couple of weeks ago I had to re-clean the ITB speed sensor, but that is the first time since a updated part was fitted in July.
There is no official TCRU training yet but my techs have been showing me how to replace stuff, we have a TCRU Kit onsite, think of her as a c901 on steroids.
I have taken a few photo's, shortly after delivery, with all the doors open it's a bit of a beast I will try to post them at some point.