Re: .PSD file in Illustrator won't let me set it to overprint?
> {quote:title=John W wrote:}{quote}
> When files with embedded images require imposition from within ai, often one can end up with humongous files, indeed files that will not RIP or manage because of file sizes (>1GB). Linked files OTOH, do not cause such bloating and are therefore desireable at times. Embedded files are also often to produce poorer quality because they are embeeded at size as where linked files may be sized down. For the smooth lines on the side of a car as an example, a placed image at 50% produces superior results (less stepping) than does an embedded version or even a pdf version FTM (downsampling!). If editing of an embedded image is to occur, the extraction process also loses any of the aforementioned sizing quality gains. So only embed when forced to must be the rule, IMO.
>
> John W
Hi John,
I agree with you that at extreme file sizes, working with embedded artwork can be too traumatic when it comes to saving - especially when the files are PDF compatible (default). I tend to top out at 250Mb file sizes, but with newer and faster hardware appearing all the time, this limit will rise.
However, I do not understand the comment about reduced quality. When embedding an image, you can naturally change the resolution by scaling. The effective DPI of the image is stated in Ai CS3's top context-sensitive toolbar. So if you scale the image to be 300dpi or more (if the image had a dpi setting, this will be used as its default), it would output the same as a linked image also set to 300dpi.
You have to take care at output stage that no downsampling takes place, if that's not what you wish. But otherwise have you got any experience of this being contrary?
Finally, I know I'm now going to be both annoyingly biased and smug, but I have no problem with editing embedded images without loss... ( [Phantasm CS Studio plugin link|
http://www.phantasmcs.com/features/index.html#editimage] ).
All the best,
Nick