I know many press operators who would disagree with that statement.
Screened patches of known values are nice to use when determining dot gain.
Press operators aren't necessarily truthful or forthcoming to "outsiders" in describing what they actually do.
From a press operator's point of view, their job is to align the live image area of the presswork to the proof. The color bar is cut off and goes into the recycling bin.
Their main controls are solid ink film thickness, water, and ink transfer integrity. So those are the things they focus on.
They'll measure SIDs in the color bar. For everything else they do a visual inspection of the live image area under a loupe.
Every graphic element in the live image area tells the press operator what they need to know about water and ink transfer integrity and has much more actionable information that any single color bar. That's why you see them constantly doing what is pictured above.
Dot gain, as measured from a color bar, is not very useful a metric for the press operator, which is why they typically don't measure it. Dot gain, after all, is not a press operator's target. Aligning to the proof is.
Dot gain, , as measured from a color bar, may have some value for prepress - or a QC specialist - to help diagnose a job that has failed on press. But for the pressroom, it's usually a waste of time.