It seems the press guys are saying the CIP3 file is too heavy, but the CIP3 file is just a low-res TIFF created by resampling the actual data appearing on the plate.
So the CIP3 file from Prinergy is accurate -- it just sounds like they want one individual separation "cut back," in the same way you'd run a dot gain compensation curve on a regular plate.
There is no way to do this in Prinergy (other than the fact that if a cutback curve is run on a plate, that curve will be reflected in the CIP3 file produced) and this would never be a recommended workflow, as it would then misrepresent the plate data.
The other thing is that CIP3 data isn't designed to do "absolute" metering of ink, it is designed to do a "relative" adjustment of each of the ink keys in each of the zones across the cylinder, as a good starting point for the run.
I would have a look in the gateway software that receives and formats the CIP3 for the press console. I don't know whether all press vendors provide the ability, but control over the baseline level of ink keys for an individual separation properly belongs in the gateway or console software.
A 30-day Fix for Managed Chaos
As any print professional knows, printing can be managed chaos. Software that solves multiple problems and provides measurable and monetizable value has a direct impact on the bottom-line. “We reduced order entry costs by about 40%.” Significant savings in a shop that turns about 500 jobs a month. Learn how……. |