It seems the press guys are saying the CIP3 file is too heavy, but the CIP3 file is just a low-res TIFF created by resampling the actual data appearing on the plate.
So the CIP3 file from Prinergy is accurate -- it just sounds like they want one individual separation "cut back," in the same way you'd run a dot gain compensation curve on a regular plate.
There is no way to do this in Prinergy (other than the fact that if a cutback curve is run on a plate, that curve will be reflected in the CIP3 file produced) and this would never be a recommended workflow, as it would then misrepresent the plate data.
The other thing is that CIP3 data isn't designed to do "absolute" metering of ink, it is designed to do a "relative" adjustment of each of the ink keys in each of the zones across the cylinder, as a good starting point for the run.
I would have a look in the gateway software that receives and formats the CIP3 for the press console. I don't know whether all press vendors provide the ability, but control over the baseline level of ink keys for an individual separation properly belongs in the gateway or console software.
InSoft Automation Unveils Imp Version 14
Revolutionizing Layout Planning and Automation InSoft Automation announces the launch of Imp Version 14, the latest iteration of its industry-leading cost-based layout planning software. Packed with cutting-edge features, this release redefines efficiency, automation, and workflow optimization for printing and finishing processes. Learn more……. |