Hello Matt,
In Photoshop, the only good and accurate way to lower the ink coverage with ICC profile is the 3rd option you’ve suggested (CMYK to Lab to CMYK). Converting to RGB and back to CMYK is not a good advice.
Best regards
Louis
Louis, I have to disagree with this view.
Both in theory and in practice, I have not seen any major visual difference in converting in the following methods in Photoshop:
1) Convert from the source CMYK direct to the new CMYK profile
2) Convert from the source CMYK, to an intermediate RGB*, then to the new CMYK profile
3) Convert from the source CMYK, to an intermediate Lab mode, then to the new CMYK profile
In all of the above cases since Photoshop 6, the colour transform takes place through the ICC profiles PCS, or profile connection space - which is usually L*a*b*. One should note that although the PCS may be L*a*b* based, this is not the same thing as actually converting the pixels from CMYK to Photoshop Lab mode.
I think that the "best" modern approach in Photoshop using ICC profiles is #1 listed above. Even better would be to use a Device Link Profile in current versions of Photoshop. Some would argue that option #3 is worse than option #2. There is no need to convert to an intermediate space when one can go direct from CMYK to CMYK (unless one wishes to make subjective edits between conversions, such as increasing shadow density).
One can do better though with an action or scripting. If reducing total ink limit is the major concern, there is no real need to totally reseparate the entire image - when it is only the shadows that over over the limit. One can kludge together a "mock" DVL conversion.
*RGB can be many "flavours" - a smaller gamut such as sRGB, to a larger gamut of say Adobe RGB or ECI RGB, to a very large gamut like ProPhoto RGB or Wide Gamut RGB. Spaces such as ProPhoto will do a better job of clipping 100% pure yellow from CMYK than smaller spaces. sRGB will clip saturated cyan. This may not mean much to "natural" images that do not contain 100% pure primary colours, as opposed to synthetic images such as test targets that do.
Sincerely,
Stephen Marsh