Raymond Ramirez
Well-known member
Good afternoon folks,
I wanted to take a few minutes outs of my day to post information and my experience with Processor Less Plates. Basic understanding, Theory and hopefully some people can add their two cents to this post.
The plate in general has its good points. For one, no processor, prepress footprint greatly diminished, no harsh chemicals, no water and amongst other things no need for cleaning the processor...
Things to watch out for. Light constraints, latent image (hard to see), improper roll-up, being properly educated on the emulsions and most important exposure / curves incorrect.
In my dealings with the major manufacturers. the exposure and curves play a huge roll on how the plate is going to work.
improper exposure will decrease run length both ways... over exposure and under exposure sometimes has the same effect...
How does the emulsion come off the plate?
theoretically the dampener roller hits the plate with the right mixture of water and fountain solution. Then ink form drops a layer of ink as the tack of the ink pulls the emulsion into the paper.
The first sheets should look like blinding. or heavy Emulsification If they are not that means the emulsion will end up somewhere in the ink water train. No Bueno
The main complaint I hear is “I have to run my water high to clear the plate and then run everything low. Im running my ink to heavy”... Bad exposure or curves will cause this. Unbeknownst to the pressman, running his water to low will cause wear out the plate prematurely. The lack of protection the water gives the plate is virtually nonexistent because he is combating an over exposed plate or wrong curve applied.
This is about 90 percent of all issues I have encountered or I have come under fire.
Especially, a shop that comes off of a positive acting plate going to a negative PLP acting plate
Process Less Plate?
Non-Process Plate?
Processless Plate?
I know must be a difference in the wording?
I wanted to take a few minutes outs of my day to post information and my experience with Processor Less Plates. Basic understanding, Theory and hopefully some people can add their two cents to this post.
The plate in general has its good points. For one, no processor, prepress footprint greatly diminished, no harsh chemicals, no water and amongst other things no need for cleaning the processor...
Things to watch out for. Light constraints, latent image (hard to see), improper roll-up, being properly educated on the emulsions and most important exposure / curves incorrect.
In my dealings with the major manufacturers. the exposure and curves play a huge roll on how the plate is going to work.
improper exposure will decrease run length both ways... over exposure and under exposure sometimes has the same effect...
How does the emulsion come off the plate?
theoretically the dampener roller hits the plate with the right mixture of water and fountain solution. Then ink form drops a layer of ink as the tack of the ink pulls the emulsion into the paper.
The first sheets should look like blinding. or heavy Emulsification If they are not that means the emulsion will end up somewhere in the ink water train. No Bueno
The main complaint I hear is “I have to run my water high to clear the plate and then run everything low. Im running my ink to heavy”... Bad exposure or curves will cause this. Unbeknownst to the pressman, running his water to low will cause wear out the plate prematurely. The lack of protection the water gives the plate is virtually nonexistent because he is combating an over exposed plate or wrong curve applied.
This is about 90 percent of all issues I have encountered or I have come under fire.
Especially, a shop that comes off of a positive acting plate going to a negative PLP acting plate
Process Less Plate?
Non-Process Plate?
Processless Plate?
I know must be a difference in the wording?
Last edited: