Actually, all those things you do give up some freedom. You give up the freedom of riding in the car as you please. Wearing whatever hat you want. Those might not be important freedoms to you, but to some it might be. Why do we have the 4th amendment. We’d be much safer if the police could just come in and search as they please.
Or you could look at it this way. If you don’t like people who don’t wear mask, then you should be the one isolating yourself. Amazon, Walmart and Uber eats make it so you’d never have to leave your house. Plain and simple.
There's this underlying assumption that wearing a mask is not harmful to the wearer. I find this to be a false statement -- unless the wearer discards the masks immediately after using it and/or every 30mins.
If the mask is designed to catch contaminates ("germs, viruses, bacteria, etc") - then keeping those contaminates in close proximity to your breathing apparatus makes it more likely that the force of your breathing will pull the contaminates into your body. If the mask is not designed to catch these things then wearing the mask is useless.
UNLESS the argument is that masks neutralize the germs/viruses and makes them harmless OR if we can prove that masks don't release germs/viruses once they have been captured.
So, people are asking individuals to sacrifice their personal health for the health of strangers by voluntarily wearing a cloth theoretically filled with captured germs/viruses for extended periods of time. Which should make it squarely back into the "personal freedom category."