gordo
Well-known member
I wonder if this is a fair comparison to make as the full impact of the coronavirus death-wise has yet to be felt?
SNIP
I don't know if those realities and differences are captured well by just comparing death figures.
One can argue that death figures are key to responding to the Covid19 virus. If people get the virus but do not suffer the consequence - i.e. they get better/recover - then there is no need for a major response. I.e. No one is concerned about the impact of common cold other than the person who has the sniffles - even though the common cold causes approximately 4,500 deaths each year in the US.
Overall, the CDC estimates that 12,000 to 61,000 deaths occur annually since 2010 in the US that can be blamed on the (common) flu.
In the US during the 2017-2018 flu season there were 61,000 deaths.
During the 2018-2019 season there were 34,200 flu-related deaths.
The current total US coronavirus deaths is: 12,064
So, the number of coronavirus related deaths has a way to go in order to catch up with the past number of influenza deaths let alone exceed it. And we are entering the season when this class of virus typically disappears anyway.
Was the economy shut down during the 2017-2018 flu season? Nope.
Was the economy shut down during the 2018-2019 flu season? Nope.
Was the economy shut down during any flu season in the past 20 years? Nope.
Color me cynical about the Covid 19 response.
Perhaps, one question to ask is: who or what entity profits short and/or long term from this "pandemic"? I.e. Follow the money. You can start here: Is the CDC Sleeping With Drug Companies? You Decide... | Circle of Docs
Last edited: