Studiopress
Member
We, too are a commercial offset printer expanding into digital production. I have narrowed it down to a Xerox 550 and a Ricoh C720s. The Ricoh unit I am being offered is a demo (less than 20,000 clicks) is only $4500 more and is 20% faster at 72ppm, plus has 2x the paper capacity. I think I am being offered a fantastic price on it compared to the street price of $60,000 and up.
The Xerox is brand new. Basically same configuration for both, Fiery, Spectrophotometer, hi-capcity feeders, except the Ricoh includes the booklet finisher, the Xerox has the Advance Finisher, would be $1,000 more w/bookletmaker option. Xerox is also throwing in the Darwin VP to sweeten the deal.
Ricoh will lock in .04 color & .0079 B&W for 36 mos.
Xerox maintenance is .049 clr & .009 B&W with max yrly increase not to exceed 8% for 5 yrs. Ricoh's sounds like a better deal, right?
I am a current IKON customer, so I am acquainted with & have been satisfied with their service performance on my current office copier. Xerox service would be thru the same authorized dealer that I would be buying from and an unknown for me, although several references have given them good reports, although their shops are within the city-metro surrounding area 1 -2hrs travel time avg, while we are nearly 3 hrs away. They claim they have a couple of technicians within 45 min of us.
Both are offering me 4 wks trial, instead of 2.
I'm also wondering if $ wise (initial price), and ppm wise, if I shouldn't be actually be comparing the Xerox 700 with the Ricoh instead. The salesman is not even suggesting that model.
I've read some bad reviews on the Ricoh machine, and a few on the Xerox, so that makes my decision even harder! My main objective is to have the consistant color output, sheet handling on heavy and coated stocks, with the least amount of down time.
My deliema: should I go for the faster, but lower resolution (1200x1200) of the Ricoh for 20% more money on the purchase price and known service reputation?
Is the Xerox 550 just as good, although a bit slower at 55ppm? and for less money?
Any response would be extremely helpful. Thanks in advance!
The Xerox is brand new. Basically same configuration for both, Fiery, Spectrophotometer, hi-capcity feeders, except the Ricoh includes the booklet finisher, the Xerox has the Advance Finisher, would be $1,000 more w/bookletmaker option. Xerox is also throwing in the Darwin VP to sweeten the deal.
Ricoh will lock in .04 color & .0079 B&W for 36 mos.
Xerox maintenance is .049 clr & .009 B&W with max yrly increase not to exceed 8% for 5 yrs. Ricoh's sounds like a better deal, right?
I am a current IKON customer, so I am acquainted with & have been satisfied with their service performance on my current office copier. Xerox service would be thru the same authorized dealer that I would be buying from and an unknown for me, although several references have given them good reports, although their shops are within the city-metro surrounding area 1 -2hrs travel time avg, while we are nearly 3 hrs away. They claim they have a couple of technicians within 45 min of us.
Both are offering me 4 wks trial, instead of 2.
I'm also wondering if $ wise (initial price), and ppm wise, if I shouldn't be actually be comparing the Xerox 700 with the Ricoh instead. The salesman is not even suggesting that model.
I've read some bad reviews on the Ricoh machine, and a few on the Xerox, so that makes my decision even harder! My main objective is to have the consistant color output, sheet handling on heavy and coated stocks, with the least amount of down time.
My deliema: should I go for the faster, but lower resolution (1200x1200) of the Ricoh for 20% more money on the purchase price and known service reputation?
Is the Xerox 550 just as good, although a bit slower at 55ppm? and for less money?
Any response would be extremely helpful. Thanks in advance!