ProC900Man
Member
I have been running 2 Pro C901's for 3 months daily and they are now both about 30K from their first 400K PM. Neither machine has broken down or required any service (nor have we replaced any ORU kit parts) they just keep going...
I'm new to this forum, but I was wondering if anyone has any input on the Richo c901 and the Canon 7000vp?
I will be purchasing one of these 2, I just am not sure which one.
I've demoed them both, and for my application, the quality of both were comparable, I am not to hung up on that. Either will work for me.
The biggest concern I have is will the machines hold up, or will I be calling for service everyday? I run an implant that does about 80,000-90,000/month color.
Any other comments are welcome as well.
Thanks
We have Ikon reps and most if not all say the Ricoh is easier upkeep.
The Ricoh 901 will save you alot of money, run faster, hold a dot and screen better but will not run textured paper worth a dime. quality goes down alot once your not running digital type papers. It dont like offset papers!
Before we purchased the C901, our choice was between it and a Canon 7000. In doing research and talking to current Canon customers in our area, there was really only one choice. Ricoh. We have been very happy with our machine now for 3 months. As with all machines a bit of a learning curve on which paper it will run but it has been a great machine. In talking to Canon customers in our area their biggest complaints were #1 slow or no service, #2 machine reliability. Many of them were in the process of turning back their machines and were seriously looking at C901. Believe me this was a hard choice for me as we have ran canon machines now for over 15 years.