ShortRunMagazines
Well-known member
Does anyone currently have one of these and is putting a larger volume on it? (more than 200k/month)
We have two dc5000ap's that pretty much run till they break and are putting about 180,000 12x18 sides/month on each machine. Xerox wants to put us into a Xerox 1000 to replace the two (so 360,000/month from the get-go). We are averaging about 1 service call per 3 days per machine, so basically we are seeing a tech almost daily. We also go through a set of drums every couple of days per machine. 90% of the calls are fuser oil related so the oilless is quite attractive, but I don't like:
-being the first X800/1000 in the state
-going from 2 DC5000's to one machine that is twice as fast (no redundancy)
-hardware payment going up $600/month
-click charge going up 17%
-can't seem to get accurate info from Xerox
-->one engineering sheet says the thing draws 5.5kW and generates 18,700BTUs and another sheet says 6.08kW and 12,300BTUs (I didn't typo... More heat = less power in Xeroxland) The two engineering sheets I've seen seem to also show engine weight as being 400+ pounds different.
What I like on X1000:
-oilless fusing
-lower builds from the EA toner
-Xerox Productivity Plus (we do a lot of the maintenance)
-newest toy on the block
-one machine=less operator attention
That all being said, if it is stable, and truly press level reliability we are ready and willing to pay the extra money, but I am concerned about being a lab rat. Our work is very time-sensitive and being late can easily cost us 300-500 on a single project in additional shipping.
Any thoughts/experiences?
We have two dc5000ap's that pretty much run till they break and are putting about 180,000 12x18 sides/month on each machine. Xerox wants to put us into a Xerox 1000 to replace the two (so 360,000/month from the get-go). We are averaging about 1 service call per 3 days per machine, so basically we are seeing a tech almost daily. We also go through a set of drums every couple of days per machine. 90% of the calls are fuser oil related so the oilless is quite attractive, but I don't like:
-being the first X800/1000 in the state
-going from 2 DC5000's to one machine that is twice as fast (no redundancy)
-hardware payment going up $600/month
-click charge going up 17%
-can't seem to get accurate info from Xerox
-->one engineering sheet says the thing draws 5.5kW and generates 18,700BTUs and another sheet says 6.08kW and 12,300BTUs (I didn't typo... More heat = less power in Xeroxland) The two engineering sheets I've seen seem to also show engine weight as being 400+ pounds different.
What I like on X1000:
-oilless fusing
-lower builds from the EA toner
-Xerox Productivity Plus (we do a lot of the maintenance)
-newest toy on the block
-one machine=less operator attention
That all being said, if it is stable, and truly press level reliability we are ready and willing to pay the extra money, but I am concerned about being a lab rat. Our work is very time-sensitive and being late can easily cost us 300-500 on a single project in additional shipping.
Any thoughts/experiences?
Last edited: